Landlord wants to keep my deposit

J

Jayjay80

Registered User
Messages
30
Hello,

I am in a predicament and unsure of my rights, if any.

I moved into this property on 27th March 2010. I renewed my lease on 27th March 2011. Due to a change in circumstance we have to move. I submitted one months notice on 27th August. However my landlord advised i needed to give 42 days and I accept this.

However, he is not going to return my deposit for breaking the lease. I dont know if its the law.

This house was a complete mess when we arrived. He had to paint the house before we moved in but he was so slow in getting around to it that we offered to fo it ourselves. So we saved him a fortune. The patio doors have been broken and gaping for months and in winter we were losing all our heat but rather than fix them he decided to put in a homebond claim.

Thats all fine. I have been really understanding. We have transformed this house from a dump into a gleaming gem!!!

We've lost our jobs, we cant afford to live here anymore, we've been excellent tenants, and its just bad form for him to keep my deposit €976. I pay my rent in arrears at the months end, so ive a good mind to not pay this months and tell him to keep the deposit instead...but i'm afraid of the consequences.

My lease says the following:

The landlord agrees to pay within 14 days to the tenant when he or she quits the dwelling any deposit that he or she has paid except any portion that the landlord is entitled to retain., to cover:
Any arrears of rent and the cost of recovering such arrears, and any breach by the Tenant of Clause 2.15 and the costs incurred by the landlord in making good any breach.

I cant see what clause 2.15 actually is? But there is a long list of dont do this and dont do that...eg anti social behaviour etc.

Would appreciate any help,

Thanks
 
I just googled clause 2.15 and it says

2.15 Not to do any act that would cause deterioration in the condition the Dwelling was in at the commencement of the tenancy

If anything ive drastically improved the quality of the property!!
 
My advice is to send the above in an email to Threshold - www.threshold.ie.

They will get in touch with your landlord on your behalf. They are there to help with situations like this.



 
Jayjay80 said:
. I pay my rent in arrears at the months end, so ive a good mind to not pay this months and tell him to keep the deposit instead...but i'm afraid of the consequences.
Click to expand...

I am a landlord of one property and every tenant, bar one, has withheld the last months rent in lieu of getting deposit back.

I don't think he can do much about it. slim
 
Hi Jayjay80.

As a landlord myself, I had a tenent who moved into my house and signed a years lease, might I add we changed the house to suit them as they said they were looking to stay longterm. However 5months into the lease they like yourself said they could no longer afford the rent. I thought I would get to at least keep deposit as they were breaking the contract, however I rang the PRTB and they said that we had to give the deposit back. We did do this but I did think it was very unfair as we ended up been out of pocket a lot more. So to answer your question, yes you are entitled to keep your deposit, and a contract is a waste of time from a landlords point of view.
 
This house was a complete mess when we arrived. He had to paint the house before we moved in but he was so slow in getting around to it that we offered to fo it ourselves. So we saved him a fortune. The patio doors have been broken and gaping for months and in winter we were losing all our heat but rather than fix them he decided to put in a homebond claim
Click to expand...

Why on Earth did you rent it?

What sort of lease do you have?you cannot just walk out on a lease regardless of what other "landlords"here seem to think.

If it were me I would be enforcing leases to the letter of the law.
 
catchphrase said:
. I thought I would get to at least keep deposit as they were breaking the contract, however I rang the PRTB and they said that we had to give the deposit back.
Click to expand...

Could you clarify exactly what transpired with you and the tenant? And also what the PRTB told you.
 
you are completely within your rights to break a lease- you can go through the PRTB / threshold but they quite slow. to be honest the only thing that not paying your last months rent affects is if you want to rent again and need a land lord reference.
i used be a landlord and any reasonable landlord would be very very happy to give you back full deposit seeing as you made improvements , paid rent on time and were there well over a year. you totally within your rights to break lease .

based on land lord behavoiur i wouldn't pay last months rent, but still leave the place clean and tidy and move out in an orderly fashion. Take plenty of photos of place on day you move out, inside of fridge, improvemnts you made etc - this means if you looking for another rental you can explain to new landlord what happened , and show pics of how you left last place. you can use bank statements to show you paid rent on time . and its still worth registering your complaint with threshold . good luck.
 
choccy said:
you totally within your rights to break lease .
Click to expand...

No you are not

If the tenant decides to break the lease the Landlord is entitled to withhold whatever the break costs eg cost of re-letting (advertising, PRTB registration etc) and any void period between them leaving and you getting a new tenant the onus is on the Landlord to expedite this asap but with the rental market being what it is it could take a while....there is only one out clause for a tenant in that they're permitted to assign the lease ie get replacement tenants that the Landlord is happy with,other than that any suggestion that the tenant can just walk away from a lease is usually made by Landlords who havent a scooby doo.

I have had tenants in the past come to me saying they had both lost their jobs and could they break their lease,I replied that I was entirely sympathetic to their plight and if they could produce original p45s I would be happy to allow them break the lease...guess what??

I never heard a dicky bird from them about lease breaking after that.
 
Can a landlord keep renewing a fixed term tenancy and thus avoid the obligations of the Residential Tenancies Act ?
 
oldnick said:
Can a landlord keep renewing a fixed term tenancy and thus avoid the obligations of the Residential Tenancies Act ?
Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean?you cannot avoid the obligations of the Residential Tenancies Act.

If memory serves there was a case before PRTB where the tenant had signed up to a second fixed term lease but the PRTB ruled that they 'enjoyed the protections of a Part 4 Tenancy, as defined pursuant to Section 28 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2004' regardless of the nature of the fixed term lease.

Hope this is what you mean?
 
Knuttell said:
No you are not

If the tenant decides to break the lease the Landlord is entitled to withhold whatever the break costs eg cost of re-letting (advertising, PRTB registration etc) and any void period between them leaving and you getting a new tenant the onus is on the Landlord to expedite this asap.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure about that? The advertising and PRTB registration.

In this case the tenant did not serve valid notice and the landlord is entitled to proper notice and if he is not able to rent immediately (leaving him with no loss) then the deposit can be taken as rent. As you said currently, in general, it's taking longer to rent so OP will probably lose her deposit.

Very clever on the P45's - good advice.
 
oldnick said:
Can a landlord keep renewing a fixed term tenancy and thus avoid the obligations of the Residential Tenancies Act ?
Click to expand...

There is no way to avoid the obligations of the Act, you cannot contract out of the Act with the tenant.
 
bronte -if tenant agreed to 42 days and according to the Act this is correct then why is he keeping deposit ?
I think the answer may be that the tenant had a fixed term lease -the second with the landlord and therefore the tenant had to stick to thast fixed term lease time frame.

My question is -can a lanlord keep renewing a fixed term lease which does ,I believe, mean that the notice terms in the RTA can be ignored ?
If the landlord can keep renewing then he is right to penalise the teant.
If the landlord cannot do so then he is wrong.

I am genuinely confused by the RTA provisions and what seems to be the "get-out" aspect of the fixed lease aspect.
 
Sorry Knutell, I overlooked your post earlier today. You basically answered the question I posed . That is, the landlord cannot keep renewing fixed term tenancies and the tenant enjoys the protection of the RTA and can break a lease (with proper notice).

I'm still being thick here - why then did you forcefully state that the OP could not break his lease ?? ( in response to advice from choccy who said "you can break your lease").

Sorry for my confusion.

So, anyone, can this tenant break his lease with 42 days notice ?
 
oldnick said:
I'm still being thick here - why then did you forcefully state that the OP could not break his lease ?? ( in response to advice from choccy who said "you can break your lease").
Click to expand...

The answer is in my original post Nick

If the tenant decides to break the lease the Landlord is entitled to withhold whatever the break costs eg cost of re-letting (advertising, PRTB registration etc) and any void period between them leaving and you getting a new tenant the onus is on the Landlord to expedite this asap but with the rental market being what it is it could take a while
Click to expand...

They cannot just walk away fro the lease without consequence as suggested by previous posters,the only out clause is
they're permitted to assign the lease ie get replacement tenants that the Landlord is happy with
Click to expand...

As you can see that is markedly different to the notion that a tenant can just break the lease and ride off into the sunset and the actual reality.


Call me old fashioned but when I sign my name to something or when I give my word,thats it,its cast in Iron as far as I am concerned.
 
yes, yes knuttel I get the moral aspect. It's the legal point I'm unsure about .

According to a" Guide to Residential Tenancies Act from Dept Environment"
" tenancies will be terminated by means of a notice of termination regardless of why the termination is happening...Tenants need not give a reason for terminating."

Periods of notice are then listed e.g.1-2 years -42 days notice.

So, it is clear there that a tenant can legally break a lease....

Now, I gather this does not apply to a fixed term lease. That is why i asked the question - can a landlord keep on renewing a fixed term lease and thus avoid the RTA rules. You replied that you remembered a case where it was ruled a landlord cannot do so.

Sorry -but still confused -there seem to be two different answers on this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top