Is there a reason why JB is paid for a max of 1 year?

W

Worried62

Registered User
Messages
23
Is it because it is expected that you would have got employment again by that stage, or something?

I'm just wondering what the reason for the distinction between Jobseeker's Benefit and Jobseekers Allowance is.
 
Jobseekers Benefit is the payment of an insurance claim. Your premium was your PRSI contribution record. So they insure one year of your claim in exchange for you paying PRSI.

JA is lower and is means tested. If you have other wealth, you don't get JA. Your other assets and income is ignored for JB purposes.
 
Paying Unemployment Insurance for too long may reduce the incentive to seek work.

Many countries pay UI for 6 months, some for 12, some for up to 24 months.
 
Brendan Burgess said:
JA is lower and is means tested. If you have other wealth, you don't get JA.
Click to expand...

I'm not speaking from personal experience but I don't think that this is accurate at all. If you have savings in the bank you might still be entitled to some level of JA. See here. As I understand it the person in the example with €55,000 in savings, giving a means of €90 per week, would still be entitled to a JA payment of €106 per week ie the maximum personal JA rate of €196 per week minus the means of €90 per week.
 
Brendan Burgess said:
Jobseekers Benefit is the payment of an insurance claim. Your premium was your PRSI contribution record. So they insure one year of your claim in exchange for you paying PRSI.

JA is lower and is means tested. If you have other wealth, you don't get JA. Your other assets and income is ignored for JB purposes.
Click to expand...


JA is not lower it is the exact same payment as JB. And if you have other wealth it does not necessarly bar you from claiming JA, you are allowed to have a certain amount of savings and still claim it. I think the figure is 20,000 euro in savings but I am not exactly sure. Anything over this figure or any other income an unemployed person has such as rental income, maintenance, divident payments etc is means tested and the rate of JA that is payable is reduced accordingly. Your own home is not assessed as means for JA purposes.
 
Last edited:
Marietta said:
JA is not lower it is the exact same payment as JB. And if you have other wealth it does not necessarly bar you from claiming JA, you are allowed to have a certain amount of savings and still claim it. I think the figure is 20,000 euro in savings but I am not exactly sure. Anything over this figure or any other income an unemployed person has such as rental income, maintenance, divident payments etc is means tested and the rate of JA that is payable is reduced accordingly. Your own home is not assessed as means for JA purposes.
Click to expand...

20k is correct.

If you have €55,000 savings:
The first €20,000 is assessed as nil, €20,000 to €30,000 is assessed as €10, €30,000 to €40,000 is assessed as €20, €40,000 and €55,000 is assessed as €60.
€10 €20 €60 = €90
Savings of €55,000 gives a means of €90 per week.
Click to expand...
 
JA can be lower than JB if the person claiming is under 25, as the maximum amount of JA payable is €100 for 18-21 yr olds, and €150 for 22-24 yr olds.
 
gipimann said:
JA can be lower than JB if the person claiming is under 25, as the maximum amount of JA payable is €100 for 18-21 yr olds, and €150 for 22-24 yr olds.
Click to expand...


Yes you are right, there have been so many recent changes its nearly a full time job keeping on top of it all:(
 
Birroc said:
Would it be a good idea to throw any savings over 20k at the mortgage and thus be eligible for higher JA?
Click to expand...

Has anyone done this?

It seems to work very much to the disadvantage to one who has saved frugally over the years, became redundant & now does not benefit.

I would be interested to know if anyone has done this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top