Moved from another thread - Brendan
Incidentally, could you indicate your thinking behind the 150,000 figure? I would have estimated that only a fraction of this figure would be genuinely "captive" variable rate borrowers that are not in a position to switch or fix at a lower rate.
Incidentally, could you indicate your thinking behind the 150,000 figure? I would have estimated that only a fraction of this figure would be genuinely "captive" variable rate borrowers that are not in a position to switch or fix at a lower rate.
Last edited by a moderator: