Does this sound like the U.S. to you?

E

Elk

Guest
The 14 Characteristics of Fascism
by Lawrence Britt
Spring 2003
Free Inquiry magazine




Political scientist Dr. Lawrence Britt recently wrote an article about fascism ("Fascism Anyone?," Free Inquiry, Spring 2003, page 20). Studying the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile), Dr. Britt found they all had 14 elements in common. He calls these the identifying characteristics of fascism. The excerpt is in accordance with the magazine's policy.

The 14 characteristics are:
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism

Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights

Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause

The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military

Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

5. Rampant Sexism

The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.

6. Controlled Mass Media

Sometimes to media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National Security

Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined

Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected

The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is Suppressed

Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed .

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts

Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment

Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption

Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.

14. Fraudulent Elections

Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.



Copyright © 2003 Free Inquiry magazine
Reprinted for Fair Use Only.
 
Contrary to some belief on this board I don't think this all sounds like America.

A lot of it certainly sounds like Bush's administration though.
 
Agreed Piggy

Yeagh that subject heading was types in haste. You are correct it is the Bush administration and not U.S.

Anyway to change the subject?
 
USA?

sexism, cronyism, corruption, racism...why, thats Ireland! innit?
 
Just read this article from the BBC website. Makes for interesting reading. Seems that it's not only leftist hippie types that worry about Bush and his foreign policy.


---------------------------------------------------------
A group of senior former US government officials will release a statement later this week condemning President George W Bush's foreign policy.
The group call themselves Diplomats and Military Commanders for Change.

They say Mr Bush's policies have made the US more isolated and less safe, and damaged its standing in the world.

The BBC's Jon Leyne in Washington says former officials have criticised Mr Bush before, but this time the critics are especially well-respected.

What has caused us to speak out in what could be seen as a partisan or political way is simply our deep, deep concern about the future security of the United States

Phyllis Oakley
Former state department official
They include William Crowe, who as chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, was America's top military officer and Admiral Stansfield Turner, a former director of the CIA.

The statement follows criticism last month by 53 former diplomats who accused the administration of undermining US credibility in the Arab world with its strong support for Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

The British government has also come under fire, with 52 former officials attacking Prime Minister Tony Blair's support for Washington over Iraq and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

'Dangerous posture'

Those signing the statement say they believe the Bush administration has made the international outlook more unstable and dangerous.

DIPLOMATS AND MILITARY COMMANDERS FOR CHANGE
William C Harrop
Ambassador to Israel under Bush Sr
Gen Joseph P Hoar
Commander in chief of US Central Command under Bush Sr; supports John Kerr
Merrill A McPeak
Former Air Force chief of staff; supports Kerry
Jack F Matlock
Ambassador to the USSR under Reagan and Bush Sr
Adm William J Crowe
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under Reagan and ambassador to UK under Clinton; has endorsed Kerry
Adm Stansfield Turner
CIA director under Carter; has endorsed Kerry
Phyllis Oakley, the former deputy state department spokesperson under President Reagan, told the BBC World Service's World Today programme that Mr Bush's Iraq policy had played a big part in their decision to publicise their concerns.

"But it goes beyond that to the whole thrust of his posture for the US and the world - to move away from the international structures that have been painstakingly built up over the years, away from our work with allies," she said.

Ms Oakley said it was a "dangerous posture" for the US to act as the "unilateral, sole superpower" that could impose its will on others.

"We cannot go it alone," she said.

In their criticisms of US policy on Iraq, the signatories say that all the assumptions made by the administration before the invasion have been proved wrong.

"It's a plea with the president to more urgently seek multilateral support for what we're doing in Iraq, to go back and forth in strengthening the alliances we've traditionally worked with," Admiral Crowe told the BBC.

'Failed policies'

The group is made up of both Democrats and Republicans.

Known critics of the administration were deliberately excluded.

However, several individual signatories have said they will back Mr Bush's Democrat challenger John Kerry and others say that the document is in effect calling for the president's removal.

"It is clear that the statement calls for the defeat of the administration," Mr Harrop said.

But supporters of the administration said the former officials who signed the letter were simply trying to hide the inadequacy of their own policies.

"Largely, they are people who were in senior official capacities before 9/11. They are people who are responsible for the policies prior to 9/11. Those policies I think, failed spectacularly on 9/11," Cliff May, president of the conservative Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, told the BBC.

"It seems that these folks feel that those policies in place before 9/11 were perfectly fine. Nevertheless, these are what some people might describe as 9/10 people, they want to continue with the failed policies and they don't want to change those policies despite their failures."
---------------------------------------------------------
 
USA?

I get the feeling the author focused on the similarities between the current Bush Administration and the other Regimes listed, rather than simply doing an objective look at fascism.

Don't get me wrong I'm no fan of the Bush Regime, and I've long pointed out that Bush has handed a major victory to the terrorists by sacrificing liberty for security and ending up with neither. (As Ben Franklin would have said).

But it's a bit simplistic to say "OH MY GOD, the US has become a Fascist state". There were elements of Fascism in the US before Bush, there will be after he's gone. There's Fascism in the UK, France, Germany, and yes, even Ireland.

All we can do is keep pointing it out and hope that Democracy can stay ahead it.

-Rd
 
Get real

In a fascist state, the thought police would have long since raided BB's home/office, searched his computer, and rooted out the piggys of this world.

The more I see "eminent" denunciations of the Bush "regime" from erstwhile pillars of the so called military industrial establishment, the more I am convinced that the US is truly an open democracy.

And they certainly do Tribunals far better than us.

BTW, isn't it going jolly well in Iraq. :D
 
Re: Get real

Adolph,

I don't think anyone would argue that America is not a democracy...so I'm not sure I understand your point about being "convinced that the US is truly an open democracy" in relation to the fact that there is open dissension in the US over Bush's foreign policy.
 
True fascism

Piggy, Stalin and my namesake had a way of dealing with dissident generals - they disappeared.

At worst Bush's foreign policy is ill judged but these outrageous insinuated comparisons between (even Bush's) America and truly aborrhent regimes really does p*ss me off.
 
Re: True fascism

Adolf,

I don't think that America is a facist state and you might or might not be confusing Elk's original article with the one I posted from the BBC website.

I did see similarities between Bush's administration and the characteristics of a facist state...namely Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause, Supremacy of the Military, Controlled Mass Media, Obsession with National Security and Fraudulent Elections. This does not make the US facist though.

Daltonr summed it up when he said that there are elements of facism in every government. Even democratic ones.
 
now there's a thing!

I agree with you piggy.........well holy God! I thought I'd be carried out feet first before I'd see the day.
A reasoned voice and correctly targeted criticisms (whether you agree with them or not) and a stance in the middle ground away from the stereo types.
I know this sounds incredibly patronising, but I'm proud of you piggy.
Now if only rainyday would clime down from that high horse we could all talk on the same level. (Joke! Jasus, no, don't attack me rainyweek, I'm not able for it.)
 
Re: now there's a thing!

I think the one of the main things a fascists state needs is a dictator, and I think America has one.

It is not the president, or the people in his administration, but rather big business. I think they own America and it is them who have real control.
After all, it is money which gets the American president elected - nothing else.
 
America

America, or the UK for that matter , are not perfect, but they defended us against the Nazi in WW2 , the eastern block in the Cold war and now they are in the front line against terrorism. Who put money and aid in to Germany and Japan after WW2, who is putting money in to most countries now? Where did we go looking for work when there was none here ?

Lets not bite the hand of an old friend.

Or do you think Saddam Hussein would have opened lots of factories here ?
 
Re: America

P - maybe the wrong side won WWII.
 
At last some honesty from the PAASengers

XXAPXX, that is an honest and revealing post. You and all the rest of the PAAS brigade actually would have preferred the fascists to have won WWII.
 
Wrong side won

DeVelera's appearance at Hitler's memorial service (the ONLY elected leader to show up to pay his respects, mind you) seems to speak volumes as to who the Irish leadership, at any rate, wanted to win!

And in 1991 Oirland was the ONLY nation on the planet to oppose the removal of Saddam from Kuwait. Anyone care to illustrate why refusing to oppose a cruel and barbaric invasion THEN is so very different now?
 
Wrong side won

My suspicion too. Getting them to take our BSE infected beef and selling passports to the Saudis helps explain, possibly, the United Nations resolution cave-in I cited previously:( [broken link removed] Maybe there's oil in this equation somewhere too??

Some have bemoaned the alleged power of the Jewish lobby in American politics. Maybe so. But is Ireland not guilty of swaying and compromising under Arab/Muslim pressure? Just what did we gain, for example, by agreeing to harbour the two Palestinian gunmen who were holed up in that church last year? Anyone figure that one out yet?

Along with being a key player in the world weapons trade, little 'ol Oirland sure seems to be holding its own on the world stage while at the same time managing to furiously posture itself as a neutral and above-it-all nation that is selflessly devoted to peace before profits etc. The emperor here truly has no clothes.
 
Back
Top