With regards to the complexity of identification of the impacted, the calculations , contact and redress how come AIB/EBS and PTSB can be so far along, almost a year ahead of the rest? Not withstanding those in dispute thinking that they have a case, or those like myself appealing from affected to a property loss or those on incorrect rate, the Lions share of the work was completed, affected advised, calculations done and redress paid. If anything the first to complete their investigation should have had the most hiccups
Without doubt, AIB had their own agenda for their efficiency ( for the want of a better word ) but what this does tell us that where there is a will, there is most work done?
I've said it before , the internal processes have been done by others, caluations etc. Why are the remainder of the banks ( whom we know talk to each other when it suits) not sharing information etc or being asked to share it by the CB to speed things along? We're not talking trade secrets, just processes.
CB should have enforced fines long before now as part of the phases, less lawyering up time for the banks more will/ incentive.
Oh and a big thanks to UB and KBC for their arrogance at the Oireachtas committee meetings, surely helped in the recent media interest, superb own goal in my opinion.