Will BOI know (or care) that my other property is now being rented out?

SunnyOct8

Registered User
Messages
8
@Paul F

Thanks for getting back to me on this all those weeks ago. We got sidetracked by family illness (minor thankfully - but enough to distract!) and haven't got any forms together for switching to AIB and their rates have gone up since.

So we are thinking of going with KBC 10 year fixed - feedback from them is that it's pretty quick once forms go in.


So my question is - I have a house that I bought before I met my husband which we now rent out. The mortgage for that property was with ICS originally - and is now with BOI - on a tracker. I have a concern that if our KBC mortgage automatically transfers to them - and they find that I have 2 mortgages with them - could they question the rental property being on a tracker and backdate re-payments?

Let me know if this query should be on a different forum Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The mortgage for that property was with ICS originally - and is now with BOI - on a tracker.
Does the contract say that the tracker rate is only valid for a PPR? Some contracts say this, some don't.

I have a concern that if our KBC mortgage automatically transfers to them - and they find that I have 2 mortgages with them - could they question the rental property being on a tracker and backdate re-payments?
It's hard to say but I suspect that the full integration of their information systems will take a long time, if it happens at all. You would also need someone to run code on both databases to look for potential cases and these kind of matching techniques are difficult because address and name data is often not identical. Even if they found matches there would be false positives which require a lot of manual work to reject. There may also be legal issues with this. Also reputational - they don't want to end up on Liveline having sent letters to people accusing them of not living in their PPR.

So while I wouldn't rule it out I doubt that this would happen at all quickly.
 
The straight answer I would imagine is, Yes they could, but half the country is doing it and nothing has happened to them as far as I know. Worse situation that could happen is revenue not being told. That's a different ball game entirely if they go trawling back.
 
Would imagine so - its a contractual agreement but only reason I can see why this would be the case (that rates for BTL are higher than PPR) is because BTLs are seen as higher risk (when I worked at one bank circa 2014-2015 & had some interaction with the Arrears teams at work it seemed that around 50% if not more were BTL mortgages on their radar). Which in ways is surprising as its easier to repossess a non PPR than it is the "family home" (as if BTLs were not someone else's "family home").
 
Which in ways is surprising as its easier to repossess a non PPR than it is the "family home" (as if BTLs were not someone else's "family home").
The issue is that when income is tight people will divert rental payments to service PPR mortgage and default on the BTL.