Why don’t women who suffered the ‘Marriage Ban’ sue the State?

As a working mother with 3 children my view on this is very different. There was no childcare in Dublin up to the mid to late 80’s. Maternity leave was 12 weeks. Women used to go into work up to and including their due date. There was no parental leave. A lot of the women who stayed at home were highly critical of working mothers. This had nothing to do with religion. It was very difficult for women to work if a child got sick time off had to be taken from annual leave. Work life balance did not exist. It is now as it was then having your rights and enforcing them are very different. The judgements from the WRC are public knowledge and the max payable is 2 years salary minus social welfare. It is not what most people want on their CV. I was in the private sector so the marriage bar was irrelevant. A lot of these issues are coming up now as pensions are very different for the public and the private sector. There was a different class of ‘stamp’ or prsi paid. Hindsight has a great view.
 
When the social history of Ireland pre 1973 is written there will be many open mouths reading it. Of course the treatment of the marriage ban on females will feature. But, when I think back in the days (and I'm a "straight" person) the male/female homosexuality issues were mind blowing. Some of the stuff they endured was appallingly dreadful (and I'm not blaming any church). If any people are entitled to sue the state for any issues pre 1973 it is the gay community.
 
Every word of this is true.

My eldest sister was in the civil service and at the time she married, the “ban” had been lifted and was replaced by a lump sum incentive to leave within 3 years of marriage.

Her husband’s employment was precarious and so she decided to stay in her job for the sake of a regular income.

For a long time, she was bitter about having to forego the lump sum when many of colleagues married “well”, left their jobs and got a nice deposit for a decent house.

She got all the grief that was going about being a two-income household when many households didn’t even have one.

It was a horrible time to live in Ireland - no matter which side of the line you inhabited.
 
All women should look at this with suspicion. This was the reason given for children's allowance to be paid into a mothers account. This in itself has a very long history. Up to the time of the Family Home Protection Act being passed a person (usually a man) could sell the home without the consent or knowledge of his spouse. All of these little things were hard fought for. As women had no income it had huge ramifications.
 
True. David Norris was the person who fought hard for gay rights. The Incitement to Hatred Act was thanks to his hard work. It was a lot later than 1973.
 

That wasn't unique to Ireland. Have a look at the timeline in this link.