Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,766
I often look at the USA where much of the national dialogue is that the State (the government) takes your money and wastes it. When a new programme/initiative/spending measure is proposed the first question from most people is “how much will this cost me?”.
I think that if that is the only dialogue it is dangerous because it is divisive and creates a fractured society.
The opposite happens here; spending is seen as unreservedly good. We should build more houses, we should spend more money on health, we should increase everyone’s wages, we should increase pensions, we should increase welfare and allowances. I think that is more dangerous. It is socially and economically damaging and encourages a culture of mediocrity within the State sector. We need to change our national dialogue to add in a little bit of the “how much will this cost me?”. Throwing money at problems rarely fixes them. I firmly believe that the problem within the State Healthcare system, and the Healthcare delivery industry generally, is cultural rather than financial. When there is a culture of management excellence, a culture of identifying and adopting best practice in administration, a culture of sensible and real KPI’s that are identified and managed at a front line management level, then we have some chance of our Public Healthcare Service actually serving the Public properly.
The same applies to all State bodies and all organisations both private and public. It just so happens that with health it really is a matter of life and death.
The result of doing nothing, i.e. continuing to do what we are doing, is the continuous hollowing out of the middle ground in politic and society. The result of incompetent and wasteful public administration is the undermining of democracy with justifiable anger pushing people further to the left and right. The result is Trump or Corbin, Sinn Fein and populism, Brexit and Nationalism. The people who run the State, the Public Servants who are the permanent Government behind the transient political circus, are also the custodians of our democracy as their actions determine whether the people consider the authority of the State to be legitimate.
So, why don’t TD’s vote against increases in spending? It’s the same reason that we cough when we’ve a cold; it is just a symptom of a bigger problem.
Minister for Health Simon Harris said he was frustrated to hear the health conversation being reduced to one about economics.
"When you are the Minister for Health and patients turn up at hospital looking for a service, what are you meant to say? Are you mean to say sorry we've spent all the money for this year," he said.
I heard Harris say that on the radio show today and nearly fell about my kitchen laughing. This guy is allegedly 1 of the leading lights in the new wave of politicians coming though here.At least Séamus Coffey of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council is shouting stop!
IFAC chief warns against using €1bn windfall in Budget
The Chairman of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council has warned the Government against using a €1bn corporation tax windfall to announce a bigger than expected Budget on Tuesday.
...
Minister for Health Simon Harris said he was frustrated to hear the health conversation being reduced to one about economics.
"When you are the Minister for Health and patients turn up at hospital looking for a service, what are you meant to say? Are you mean to say sorry we've spent all the money for this year," he said.
I heard Harris say that on the radio show today and nearly fell about my kitchen laughing. This guy is allegedly 1 of the leading lights in the new wave of politicians coming though here.
There may come a day soon when we year for Charlie, Albert, Garrett etc again
Hidden in there is big savings now being made by the HSE when it comes to pensions to people now retiring on an PRSI A1 stamp 12700 euro per year now comes out of the PRSI fund for each A1 retiree,I listened to the Pat Kenny show this morning.
A person contacted the programme. They served on the bord of a major hospital during the recession as a representative of business with no links to health care.
One observation they made was that hospitals have very little discretion over spending.
leaving only minor expenses as discretionary.
- Salaries are per public service agreements
- Drug purchases are managed via central agreements
- Large equipment was capital budget,
And yet, at least with acute hospitals, they have very little control over their intake and often they cannot discharge patients because of well-known shortages of step-down facilities particularly in certain geographical areas, such as North Dublin.
Process changes can be made to improve efficiency only to a certain degree before the unions baulk.
The picture often painted of hospital management being very poor is untrue and unfa
Hospital management weren’t in a position to defend themselves publicly because it would often entail criticizing the HSE which controls the budgets. -end
Both Pat Kenny & Regina Doherty, a guest on the programme, wondered, in the light of this, where were the overspend. It can’t be pay, it can’t be drugs, it can’t be equipment.
Since constant overruns very much impinges on other spending, instead of trying to guess the reason, perhaps we should demand a detailed breakdown of the overspend.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?