markowitzman
Registered User
- Messages
- 936
Seems a complete waste in view that they seem so complicated to build and probably took so long to build centuries ago.
Why did the folks just stick a standard roof on the church or am I missing something?
Does everything have to be so practical?
I'm not overly bothered with what goes on beneath the spire, but I think most churches are beautifully designed and a pleasure to look at. For me that's reason enough.
Have you not noticed any of the many monstrosities that were built particularly from the 1950s onwards?I think most churches are beautifully designed and a pleasure to look at.
Have you not noticed any of the many monstrosities that were built particularly from the 1950s onwards?
Have you not noticed any of the many monstrosities that were built particularly from the 1950s onwards?
Monasteries and churches would tend to have differnet design anyway, with the monastery having to be practical in that it houses people.
What are the "vents" on the side for?
1. an opening, as in a wall, serving as an outlet for air, smoke, fumes, or the like
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?