presidenttttt
Registered User
- Messages
- 413
Let's move these goalpost up 50%.What is the net profit that a landlord can expect to make these days in the current market, the one that is apparently seeing them leave in droves?
Then compare that to a scheme with very low mortgage repayments coupled with low rents (but say perhaps 50% above the mortgage repayment).
True, but in this case the landlord (on a 30yr term of the 120yr loan) will only be liable on effectively €90,000 of the loan.1. Lenders want higher interest rates for longer loans
Your numbers suggest 2.3% capital gain per year, fair, but you ignore capital gains tax
Your gross rent profit of 600 a month will not cover the repairs, renovations.
One bad tenant and your 120 year investment is dead in the water
It will give you around 4,780 individual shares in the company while can be sold of entireley seperately of each other, unlike a house where you only own part of one house and can't partially sell it.A €300,000 investment of Coca-Cola (a €300bn company) will get you 0.001% share ownership.
This makes no sense whatsoever.Instead of taking a €360,000 mortgage (100% for ease of reference) over 30yrs, the mortgage is spread over 100yrs - effectively a €90,000 mortgage over 30yrs.
That's not how numbers work.True, but in this case the landlord (on a 30yr term of the 120yr loan) will only be liable on effectively €90,000 of the loan.
The Irish public still crave a 3 bedroom house. All this would do is provide another Government subsidy to a lucky few and make absolutely no difference to supply.2. There is a cohort of wanna-be FTB's caught in the rental trap of not being able to save because of high rents. This cohort of individuals, co-habiting couples, and families, to be offered first preference to purchase a property where the landlord is signalling an intent to sell the property. Some tax sweeteners for the exiting landlord and the wanna-FTB's to make the process as smooth and quick as possible.
Such a scheme would significantly reduce the underbelly of FTB demand caught in the rental trap.
That's not how numbers work.
A landlord can't go to bank and get a 300k loan but only pay interest on 90k of it.Its called financial engineering. You have heard of off-book accounting? Quantatitive Easing? Currency devaluation? etc?
No it isn't. That's cashflow.That is a an average yearly profit of €229.92 on an average priced home with average rents.
Can you set out, with workings, how you believe this works? Who is paying the interest on the other €221k of the loan?The financial lenders can effectively reduce the repayment to an equivilent of a loan that is 1/4 of €294459.20 loan, or about €75,000 plus the interest.
Who's paying the rest of it?The mortgage repayments reduce dramatically to around €850.00pm
Again, this is cashflow, not gainThats a €5,100 annual gain for the landlord compared to €229.92
Only if the magic free money your plan requires is given by someone elseThe rent has fallen by nearly €800pm!
How has the rent doubled if you have linked it to the mortgage repayments?The property (and rent) has near doubled in value
You've ignored CGT and most of the interest on the loan.the landlord receives €800,000 less the outstanding remainder of the 120yr mortgage (294,459.20 - 75,000 leaving 219,459.20 to pay on the house).
Ok, so you're saying the government is paying ¾ of the interest for buy to lets, giving free use of that capital to the landlord while allowing them to keep 100% of the income and 100% of the capital appreciation, and the 120 year term is a red herring as each landlord only gets a 30 year term. Quite brilliant. A great use of my taxes to transfer wealth from both the renter and the taxpayer to the landlords (and a little to the banks), with no benefit to the government, who also have to repay the borrowing with further raids on the public purse, as all the positive cashflow accrues to the landlord (well, the bank gets a small cut too). It sounds alike you've invented social housing that the government never actually owns but pays for and, for no discernable reason whatsoever, lines the pockets of a few landlords.Except! by virtue of the €1.5bn fund, the bank only charges repayments equvilant of 1/4 of that €560,000. In effect a mortgage of €140,000.
Why is there any need to involve a landlord on this scenario?And the cycle contines for a third and fourth generation yielding the financial instiution profits on the loans, the landlord significant returns on investment and tenants, affordable and real alternative to buying.
All for the cost of €1.5bn plus interest on the State.
Under a subsidized scheme supported by the government raising €1.5bn they can, most definitely. To be clear, and my fault, the repayments on the loan are as they would be to an effective €90k.A landlord can't go to bank and get a 300k loan but only pay interest on 90k of it.
The interest is absorbed by the State raising €1.5bn on the markets for properties tied to this scheme.Can you set out, with workings, how you believe this works? Who is paying the interest on the other €221k of the loan?
The landlord, presumably will try to maximise the profit under the available conditions of the schemeHow has the rent doubled if you have linked it to the mortgage repayments?
Yes. It is. We have done it for decades for the farming, agriculture sector. We subsidise flood defences for towns and villages to protect their homes and businesses. We subsidised the catering industry by dropping VAT rates. We invest in capital infrastructure. We found billions upon billions to counter the effect of the Covid crisis, the banking crisis.A great use of my taxes to transfer wealth
Why is there any need to involve a landlord on this scenario?
The Irish public still crave a 3 bedroom house
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?