I'm pretty sure that phased restoration was reflected in last year's Finance Act but there was an expectation in some quarters that this would be escalated.And no increase in interest allowable for rental properties despite last years promise to gradually restore it to 100% by 2021.
I'm pretty sure that phased restoration was reflected in last year's Finance Act but there was an expectation in some quarters that this would be escalated.
Yes Joe but my point is that has already been enacted -
http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2016/act/18/section/16/enacted/en/html#sec16
Falling unemployment as we approach near full employment...what do you do, increase the dole.I am very disappointed. I called for social welfare to be reduced and, not only did he not reduce the payments, he increased them by €5.
The Earned Income Credit raised by a measly €200 (bringing it to €1,150 from next year - substantially below the PAYE credit of €1,650) and the 3% USC surcharge remains.
No moves on the deductibility of LPT or mortgage interest for landlords. Expect a continued exodus of landlords from the market and ever increasing rents for tenants.
I can't understand that surcharge. If you take the risk to run your own business and do well, you should be rewarded, not penalised. But if I work in a large company with a secure job, I pay less tax than someone with no guarantees or job security.
Steven
http://www.bluewaterfp.ie (www.bluewaterfp.ie)
I presume it's to make up for the government not receiving employers PRSI on a self-employed person's earnings? If a business has €30,000 available for 'pay' for a person, an employed person will get a salary of 27K with 3K going to the government in employers PRSI. The additional tax and USC on the self-employed person's 30K salary does not compensate for the loss of the employers PRSI. Self-employed people are entitled to fewer benefits but they are entitled to those that make up the bulk of PRSI spending (primarily pensions).I can't understand that surcharge. If you take the risk to run your own business and do well, you should be rewarded, not penalised. But if I work in a large company with a secure job, I pay less tax than someone with no guarantees or job security.
And the main one they don't have access to is the safety net (i.e. dole)Self-employed people are entitled to fewer benefits but they are entitled to those that make up the bulk of PRSI spending (primarily pensions).
surely the point is that the sugar tax will take in marginal amount of revenue, as its purpose is to change behaviour (of either drinks manufacturers and/or consumers)will the sugar tax be ring fenced for obesity?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?