Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 52,190
The CSO gives this information, but without knowing how many are in each age group, I don't know the incidence rate.
The November figures will be the ones that will be looked at in detail. I didn't realise we were encountering that many deaths.Weekly case stats here.
Ah, OK, you can get that from CSO numbers.Hi Leo
It's the rate I am looking for.
More than a third (34%) of cases were among people aged 25-44 while one in ten (10%) cases was in those aged 65 and over.
But what percentage of the population is in those age groups?
If 10% of the population are aged over 65, then the rate is as expected.
It's interesting that between the 6th of August and the 29th of October cases went up 40% but the percentage of those over 65 who were infected increased from 4% to 10%, so a 250% increase within that age group. Is it in fact older people who are behaving irresponsibly and need to change their behaviour?Weekly case stats here.
I think that's a good idea, particularly with the increase in house calls to be expected over the Christmas period.Is it time to refocus on those who are actually vulnerable and make sure they are protected? Should we be advising those over 75 who share a household with young people to wear a mask at home?
[broken link removed]
Week 44, 2021 COVID-19 Epidemiology Team
Your age group are obviously out drinking and carousing.19-24 year olds have 8 cases per 1,000 in the latest week.
whereas my age group, 55-64 has almost 5 cases per 1,000
That is not a huge difference to justify any different behaviour.
85+ would have been offered a booster by now, but they also have the most to lose so also likely being a lot more cautious.I wonder how it's so low in the 85+ category? Did the earlier waves kill off the most vulnerable?
Or have they got the booster by now?