Club Scrub
Registered User
- Messages
- 24
Refer the matter to the taxing master.
District Court costs are fixed - they are listed on a scale.
The actual costs of defending an action are likely to exceed the scale costs. Hence the difference. Your solicitor should have explained all of this in an initial Section 68 letter.
You may have been awarded scale costs - you may or may not be able to recover them. If your Plaintiff does not pay you are liable to pay your own solicitor - the action was taken against you and you are responsible to discharge your own solicitor's fees. If the Plaintiff does pay, it is likely that the 900 will be deducted from the total 1300.00
mf
I assumed that she would seek payment from the others solicitors etc and that would be the end of it. I certainly didnt expect to be "whacked" with an invoice this morning
All of that should have been explained in a Section 68 letter to the OP at the start.
Bronte- every firm has it's own s.68 templates and each individual file has to have a s.68 specifically for it. But there is no great mystery-
With the clients you have MF1 I don't know how you stay in business.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?