What is being done about the Bankers implicated in the current crisis?

onq

Registered User
Messages
4,388
It appears that prosecutions may proceed against Anglo directors under Section 44 of the companies Act 1990

http://www.independent.ie/breaking-news/national-news/prosecutors-given-bank-fraud-file-2892336.html


That would be this section -

http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1990/en/act/pub/0033/sec0044.html#sec44

This seems to be a totally toothless piece of legislation, with a get out of jail clause in Section 8 which appears to suggest a fine is acceptable.

Why aren't they looking at Section 31 or Section 41, for example?
 
Why aren't they looking at Section 31 or Section 41, for example?

It's late in the night and I'm about to call it a day, but at a quick glance I'd say that the chances are that the exceptions mentioned in S31 and S41 were probably met - note the 10% requirement and the fact that the stake in the company was to be 10%!!!

Remember many of these guys are ex auditors and as such they are very well aware of the disclosure requirements on things like director's loans, so it is unlikely that you are going to catch them out on something as basic as this!

Jim
 
You're welcome Purple.

I split this from the other thread as it would have pulled it off topic and it sort of complements Brendan's previous thread in this forum about the lack of prosecutions, which I felt needed bringing into clearer focus.

Instead of vague comments from Barristers about the lack of a law being broken (company law anyway, whatever about treason) I wanted to read the act itself. This is only part of it.
 


Thanks Jim,

On point as always and yes, I half expected to discover something like this.

It's almost as if the act was written with wrong doing in mind it has so many let-out clauses in it.