Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,687
Harchibald
Many people are unaware of : Totalise plc V Motley Fool
I my opinion it seems I should be quite concerned with its implications more so if I were to use a company or my employers internet access channel.
It also seems to me that it may be more problematic for me were to show reckless disregard for facts that should be known by me and continued to do so after they had been brought to my attention. I realise that could well be construed as malice.
Cheerio.
Converse2007
Here are some useful links:
http://www.journalonline.co.uk/article/1000733.aspx
http://www.tuppenceworth.ie/blog/index.php/2005/04/24/libel-liability/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/24/motley_ruling/
http://www.fool.co.uk/help/legal.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalise_Plc_v_Motley_Fool_Ltd
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1231419.stm
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/03/19/websites_forced_to_identify_forum/
http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1897.html&query=totalise&method=all
I am not Converse but I have read your contribution to the discussion on BI. Despite the fact that other examples of schemes with similar and higher charges were introduced as demanded in the initial part of the debate, these were ignored. For some reason that escapes me, much of the BI criticism was personalised to Hobbs and was malicious. You yourself described it as a rip off before it was edited. A copy has been retained. BB described it as misappropriate selling,taking a similar vein.
The facts are that the directors of BI have a case for defamation imho. This is particularly because the facts introduced were simply ignored and no attempt was made to modify the malicious criticism. AAM is just like any other publisher and broadcaster and is open to litigation as are the contributors.
The only serious unease has been the manner that the company and its directors were targeted by certain posters on AAM. This issue has nothing to do with the performance of BI's public offering and everything to do with the behaviour on this site including the censoring of the thread after the critical arguments presented by these certain posters were undermined by the facts. The malicious running allegation that BI is engaged in misappropriate selling, ripping off investors etc is way over the top and unquestionably defamatory.
I remind you and all other posters that you are legally responsible for what you post and Mr Burgess is responsible for everything that is posted. AAM is not a game to be played with peoples reputations especially when these are people of integrity unused to having their good names sullied in this manner.
The BI offering is perfectly in keeping with the syndicate market and better than most in a lot of respects. Instead for reasons I cannot fathom it has been the subject of unbalanced, ill-informed and sustained attack which it does not warrant. AAM is entitled to argue the pros and cons of any offer on the market but if it strays, as it has done, into malicious defamation you cannot be surprised if there are consequences.
Tyoung, I believe you are referring to that most obnoxious of pastimes, the speculation on equine competition. That my namesake was just about the cowardliest loser of the 2006 Champion Hurdle should not be taken as a reflection on me, and I will take such an imputation to be defamatory.Eppur si muove
The quote is familar
Harchibald
Are You Sea Pidgeon or Sir Ivor from the "Cult of Equities thread"?
Nadj, the give away is the number of your posts - a grand total of 1. Given you were having such fun with this discussion it must have been a challenge not have posted ere now. Your crescendo came yesterday so I suppose you have shown commendable restraint to sleep on it.Harchibald
Thanks ever so much. I thought your posts were quite hilarious. Your protestations of having your own PC etc were particularly funny. And your faux retraction nearly brought the house down!
My mirth reached a fresh crescendo when you took umbrage to a reference to horse racing. It brought to mind an image of on an old nag of pit pony blindly stumbling about in the sunlight and thinking its Red Rum….baying out to its friends "Hey look at me you guys!".
Well done for providing a moment of genuine hilarity in what was quite a dull Monday.
Nadjinski
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?