The OP's proposition fails because it looks at the problem from the wrong end.
If costs are cut then people can begin to live on less, but cutting wages and/or social welfare and expecting people to be able to cope with existing overpriced goods, services and utilities, is utter nonsense.
The main indices of utilities, education and communication all rose according to the consumer price index for 2010.
[broken link removed]
All areas where the state controls the costs - what does this tell us about the potential to survive this recession?
The only places necessary to cut now are the costs of these essentials, with the social welfare trailing this by a year to allow some benefits to accrue.
But the cutting the cost of an over qualified and over staffed and underworked civil service can start tomorrow.
Whether its a three day week or redundencies, we seriously need to get these costs down ASAP.
And confidentiality be damned - we seriously need a survey or our debt on a household by household basis so that we can see the actual problem not be waffled at by poor mouths with income shortfalls that have two or three foreign properties and a yacth they can can sell off to mitigate their borrowings.
Let's get real on this people and not just focus on cutting the social welfare or berating the costs of working in Ireland without doing a bit of homework and realising that it costs a lot to live here.
This is the main problem facing our return to competitiveness, not the social welfare bill - introduce competition to drive down costs and properl assess the cost of government and administration.
When this cost has been driven down, and this includes the cost of our civil service, then you can look at reducing the social welfare.
Doing it the other way is a typical Capital vs Labour strategy that will end up beggaring the weakest sections of our society.
ONQ.