.. the head told me that the school has a strong catholic ethos and is not required to accomodate non-faith children, though they do strive to be inclusive to different faiths (umm, helpful)
..
I am not happy with this at all and will be persuing it further. I don't believe that anybody would be happy with that if it was their child
jaybird said:How dare you accuse me of choosing convenience when we have no choices?
jaybird said:.. if they are forced by the education system to be catholic by default.
How on earth can he make his own mind up on religion if he is given hours of religious instruction every week from one particular religion? What a bizarre suggestion. In that case shouldn't we let all children make their own minds up, and don't teach any one particular religion in schools? Which to my mind would be ideal. Thats exactly what I want for my children, to learn about all religions and faiths and make up their own minds, which they are not allowed to do if they are forced by the education system to be catholic by default.
You have no idea what my views on religion are, as I have not mentioned them here. It is insulting to me and demeaning to yourself to jump to such conclusions.
As previously pointed out, you have choices.... Thats exactly what I want for my children, to learn about all religions and faiths and make up their own minds, which they are not allowed to do if they are forced by the education system to be catholic by default...
You did of course, you said "Pity you weren't more forceful when deciding on which school to send your child to. Maybe you chose convenience over principle ?"
.. what do you call that except forcing religious participation?
jaybird said:forced by the education system to be catholic
And the idea that a catholic school could teach pupils about different religions? How bizarre in this day and age! What are they afraid of exactly?
Like I said, isn't it easy to give suggestions when you are not in the minority, or are lucky enough to have a suitable school place for your children.
I That is because nothing is more important than my childs education.
You have not been listening to the reality if you think I can just move to gain a place. I've looked into, I would be willing. Anywhere we could move to that was even remotely commutable for work have long waiting lists, we would have to have been on the waiting list years ago. Thats not apathetic poor me not being willing to sacrifice for my ideals, its the unavoidable fact that there is no place available. Thats the point. I am willing to be attacked for many things, but please do not underestimate the time, effort and money I have invested to explore all options. And I am unfortunatly left with none. Sometimes, despite our best efforts (and I truly defy anyone with a complete lack of resources in this climate to try any harder than I have ) we don't have any options.
The best education you can get is in Catholic school because they are funded by the Catholic church,so if your education is being funded by an organisation you have to listen to them.If the State stopped their part funding of the Catholic schools who would take their place?Also it sounds they should have lessons on how to behave at Holy Communion's
I dont think anyone is suggesting that the state stop funding schools. The hope is that the catholic churchs bows out of state funded education, hands schools over to the state to be secular run .
That would be Great if the State could buy the property off them,or build Schools.That will only happen when the Vatican bank runs out of money,so it might happen soon.
That would be Great if the State could buy the property off them,or build Schools.That will only happen when the Vatican bank runs out of money,so it might happen soon.
But doesn't the state own both the land and the buildings, for some schools at least? The new school in our area was built on private land bought with state money and built with state money. My taxes went into paying for that school, why shouldn't it be as open to me as to anyone else?
Thats a part I really have trouble understanding.
But doesn't the state own both the land and the buildings, for some schools at least?
The new school in our area was built on private land bought with state money and built with state money.
My taxes went into paying for that school, why shouldn't it be as open to me as to anyone else?
Thats a part I really have trouble understanding.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?