upper age limit on investment mortgage

Another point is - what can the bank actually do if OP's father fails to pay the mortgage in full, provided he pays all interest and some (if fact, most) of the capital repayments?

While it is understandable that the bank does and will continue to pressure him for the full payments and will add extra charges if he falls in arrears and will also damage his credit rating, can the bank actually repossess any of the properties? Considering that OP's father is doing his best to pay and will in fact be able to repay in full, just a couple of years later than the bank would like.

In these circumstances would the bank really go to court seeking to repossess the properties? And would the court grant the repossession, considering the short length of time left before the mortgage will be paid anyway, the efforts made to repay and the very low LTV?

Maybe the bank is just bullying OP's father, pressuring him into selling at the wrong time, as due to low LTV the bank will still get its mortgage repaid anyway, even if properties are sold at a big loss?

greta, thanks very much for your help - much appreciated. I suppose my father is in unchartered territories here in terms of his current bank pushing him to pay off mortgage. We have no experience of going to the courts in terms of disagreement so would prefer to remortgage if at all possible with another bank. Otherwise, a chat with the tax people as bronte suggested may be another option..
 
my parents both remortgaged lately and were told that term had to conclude at age 70..there was no mechanism in the banking system for 70+ so they had a shorter repayment period than they wanted.
Same with insurances, mortgage protection, income protection etc etc all end at age 70+ across most companies (correct me if there are any exception I dont know about)
I would say renegotiation, the bank sound like they want a neat tidy end to the mortgage asap which is not necessarily in your father's interests.

thanks looking.
rusty
 
Back
Top