Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,687
No to bothMy first guess was 75 percent to both... now Im starting to overthink it...
That's what I was thinking!* Assuming the baby hasn't yet identified themselves as non binary!
Ha! Ha!My initial answer was the same as Protocol.
There are three possible combinations* so at the outset the odds of two boys is 33.3%
We now know that one of the children is a boy so presumably that alters the odds as one of those combinations is now impossible.
I still would have said 50% are the odds at this point! However given that it is not then my next guess is 66.6% but I'm not even sure of the logic behind this!
The answer for Q1 and Q2 has to be the same doesn't it?
* Assuming the baby hasn't yet identified themselves as non binary!
You may assume that it is 50% that a child is a boy and that if the eldest is a boy it is still 50% that the youngest is a boy.
I didn't say it was the first that was a boy. Maybe it was the second or maybe it was both.For Q1, at the point where you know there are two children, and one is a boy, does it not boil down to the 50/50 on the gender of the second?
For Q1, at the point where you know there are two children, and one is a boy, does it not boil down to the 50/50 on the gender of the second?
Ahhh! You're getting close. I did not say that those three are not equally likely. Read my reply to @Ceist Beag carefully.I don't think so. The boy could be the eldest or the youngest so alternatives would be boy/boy, boy/girl or girl/boy. Duke is saying that they are not equally likely so thats the bit I don't get.
No idea on the second one...
Ahhh! You're getting close. I did not say that those three are not equally likely. Read my reply to @Ceist Beag carefully.
Yep!Damn you Duke, I have work to do!
Ok, I am going with 1/3 chance that the other child is a boy....
In my experience with hard work and discipline you can overcome your innate urge to learn things and better yourself.Damn you Duke, I have work to do!
Ok, I am going with 1/3 chance that the other child is a boy....
Yep!1/3rd is the answer.
Following @Ceist Beag 's approach we argue as follows.
From the outset there are 3 possibilities
2 boys: 25% chance (50% the eldest x 50% the youngest)
2 girls: 25% chance
1 boy, 1 girl: 50% chance (because they can come in either order or simply because this must be the remaining 50%)
The second possibility is then ruled out and we are left with the other two in the same proportion as at outset i.e. 25 to 50 which gives a 1/3rd chance of 2 boys.
Now Q2 is a different kettle of fish.
No. Odds are the inverse of probabilities, not possibilities. If 2 boys are 25% chance the odds are 4 to 1, i.e 25%, i.e. 1/4.Yep!1/3rd is the answer.
Following @Ceist Beag 's approach we argue as follows.
From the outset there are 3 possibilities
2 boys: 25% chance (50% the eldest x 50% the youngest)
2 girls: 25% chance
1 boy, 1 girl: 50% chance (because they can come in either order or simply because this must be the remaining 50%)
The second possibility is then ruled out and we are left with the other two in the same proportion as at outset i.e. 25 to 50 which gives a 1/3rd chance of 2 boys.
Now Q2 is a different kettle of fish.
That is just terminology.No. Odds are the inverse of probabilities, not possibilities. If 2 boys are 25% chance the odds are 4 to 1, i.e 25%, i.e. 1/4.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?