M
To be honest, this sounds like an accident waiting to happen. I don't get the 'known to the bank' issue either - The bank is bound to have temporary staff and new staff in place from time to time - Do you expect them to have pictures of Y at every till?The cheque was not crossed ...is made payable to X and is usually cashed by Y
Y did not cash the cheque and stopped it within 10mins of being at the bank when they realised they didn't have the cash.
So the bank are telling you (and this may not be true don't forget) that someone in your organisation cashed the cheque.The bank are basically telling me that the teller who cashed the cheque is familiar with all our staff and would only have given cash to one of our staff....
Now I'm confused. The member of staff you refer to is X (as oppose to the bank clerk) ? So X did not lodge and withdraw. Z did but you don't know the identity of Z and you feel the amount wasn't worth Z's while to cash the cheque and keep it ?? Is someone out sick in the job for a few days which could explain this and have not come forward ? Only explanation I can think of apart from someone who may be leaving anyway and is a bit pi**ed off about something.However I have no reason not to believe the member of staff and I can't believe they would risk their job for such a small amount.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?