Well, I think it's difficult to maintain that there was a lack of transparency if the reversionary rate was clear on the face of the offer. Accordingly, I don't see any particular reason why your mortgage would have been included in the review.
How do you know that? Have you seen the offer letter?It's not clear!!
How do you know that? Have you seen the offer letter?
I don't think it is Todo.This is going off topic, the question is do people think the broke the cpc in the way they presented the third offer.
I don't think it is Todo.
The suggestion is that there was a breach of the CPC due to a lack of transparency regarding the reversionary rate. If the reversionary rate was clear on the face of the offer then it is difficult to maintain that there was any lack of transparency.
It probably goes without saying that only the Central Bank can decide whether or not there has been a breach of the CPC in any instance.
It falls in the category of consumer protection
Your understanding was tracker
There was a lack of transparency
I believe you have a case
Not every fixed rate will state you will return to tracker
I presume the complaint is with the FSOB
Probably for them to decide after the review
I ageee!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?