That provision (not for ownership, rather for an entitelement for a lease in perpetuity) is now gone but even before it was removed you had to have continuous posession for 20 odd years (for residential properties) and it was relatively easy to turf someone out during their 19th year. This was one of the problems of granting tenants such perpetual rights-it encouraged frightened landlords to evict perfectly good tenants for fear of losing control over their own property. The Part IV stuff replaced all this.Although I know there are issues around letting to the one person for several years (something about them eventually being able to claim ownership rights of some sort)
In general, a lease is a contract, and as such both parties are bound to its terms and conditions for the duration of the contract. If both parties are amenable to amending the terms mid-contract, I don't see a problem. (And I say this as a habitual tenant). Is there anything specific in your lease about changing terms or ending the contract early?
One other point: you mentioned that the tenants have threatened to move out if they don't get the reduction. I presume this is once the 12 months is up, because in most standard leases they are liable for the rent until the term of the lease has expired.
Just wondering what the situation with this is as my landlord rang a few
months ago to say he was selling the house. This was about 6 months into the 12month lease. He said he only had to give me enough notice for this to be allowed.
So basically is this true and also if he can I presume I can move out with the required notice and not be liable for rent?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?