Arnie Hammer
Registered User
- Messages
- 42
Maybe my parents misled me back in the day but I think it would take more than a week to bring a couple of kids into the equation!Personally I would certainly not allow it.
You let him move the GF in this week, you can't say you won't allow her move in a child or two next week.
You'd be surprised but quite lot of girlfriends have a wee toddler or two from another relationship. Maybe you didn't have all the chats you should have had with Mammy and Daddy.Maybe my parents misled me back in the day but I think it would take more than a week to bring a couple of kids into the equation!
Don't know if I agree with charging anything extra. You're letting the rooms, not a PP service. If it was a 4 bed house with one guy living in it, you'd not reduce rent, so having 3 people in a 2 bed doesn't seem justifiable to increase it, but that's just my 0.02Surely if you have two unrelated tenants, you can charge a third the same as you are charging the two existing people. Of course if two are sharing a room, then a discount on that would be reasonable.
I doubt your tenant expected to move his GF in for free or for a token amount.
Or am I missing something.
cbut that's just my 0.02
Where do you draw the line though? If the tenants stick a few bunk beds in each room and invite their families to live in the house, still no increase?Don't know if I agree with charging anything extra. You're letting the rooms, not a PP service. If it was a 4 bed house with one guy living in it, you'd not reduce rent, so having 3 people in a 2 bed doesn't seem justifiable to increase it, but that's just my 0.02
No, you tell them that they are not allowed to do that.Where do you draw the line though? If the tenants stick a few bunk beds in each room and invite their families to live in the house, still no increase?
Are women really that messy?The gf will be saving say €1000/month by moving in to this house and the wear&tear will increase by maybe 50%, seems reasonable to me the LL should be compensated for that.
I'm not suggesting you would allow it, I'm just highlighting that it's not as black and white as you've rented out the house and it doesn't matter to you how it is used once you're being paid - as you've illustrated there's line somewhere on the continuum that each LL needs to decide on.No, you tell them that they are not allowed to do that.
This happens all the time (not to that degree though. An older house has a dining room and it gets converted into a bedroom. Landlord is still getting their €2,500 for the house. Now the tenants have 5 people to split the rent instead of 4. Or when I've been travelling, it's how many can you fit in the house!!!Where do you draw the line though? If the tenants stick a few bunk beds in each room and invite their families to live in the house, still no increase?
The gf will be saving say €1000/month by moving in to this house and the wear&tear will increase by maybe 50%, seems reasonable to me the LL should be compensated for that.
She'll probably be there a lot anyway...sleeping over and all that kind of stuffPersonally I would certainly not allow it.
You let him move the GF in this week, you can't say you won't allow her move in a child or two next week.
This is a pension experts view of the property rental business.This happens all the time (not to that degree though. An older house has a dining room and it gets converted into a bedroom. Landlord is still getting their €2,500 for the house. Now the tenants have 5 people to split the rent instead of 4. Or when I've been travelling, it's how many can you fit in the house!!!
At the end of the day, the tenants themselves will want a certain level of space and comfort, so it will self regulate in that regard.
If the property is let as a whole to two people, where each is responsible for the entire rent rather than each renting a room in a shared house, that is a different matter.I wouldn’t charge a tenant of mine any extra for moving a partner in.
I rent out property on a ‘per property basis’, not on a ‘per person basis’.
Nope.If a tenant is renting a single room in a shared house, then moving in another person is a significant matter.
I guess I'm not the only non tenancy expert in this thread then...If the property is let as a whole to two people, where each is responsible for the entire rent rather than each renting a room in a shared house, that is a different matter.
If a tenant is renting a single room in a shared house, then moving in another person is a significant matter.
I see the principle but I'm not letting four bare walls but an apartment with thousands of euros of value in furniture and fittings. I have a spreadsheet with ten years of tracking repairs and replacements. An extra body is going to add about 5% of the rent to my costs and I want to be compensated.I rent out property on a ‘per property basis’, not on a ‘per person basis’.
The co-tenants could sub-let the property to another party with the consent of the landlord or they could allow another person to enter the property as a licensee.
That's indeed how it works now. The rooms are very different sizes and it's not my business how they split the rent between themNobody rents a room in a shared house. The co-tenants jointly lease the whole house and they can decide amongst themselves where they sleep at night.
5%? Why not 3%? or 15%?I see the principle but I'm not letting four bare walls but an apartment with thousands of euros of value in furniture and fittings. I have a spreadsheet with ten years of tracking repairs and replacements. An extra body is going to add about 5% of the rent to my costs and I want to be compensated.
Could they do this without my consent though? My understanding was that they couldn't.
That's indeed how it works now. The rooms are very different sizes and it's not my business how they split the rent between them
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?