vincentgav
Registered User
- Messages
- 108
The tenant is now claiming that his equipment was stolen and he's gone to the PRTB. Again, he was given the camera back. He also claims that the lease doesn't allow me to take it down, but the lease doesn't cover every single eventuality and consequence.
Perfectly simple; property owner serves notice that they need property for their own use.evict the lot of them.... that's impossible
As a landlord who has done this it is not 'perfectly simple'. It is achievable, with a lot of effort. In my case I was selling, but it was extremely stressful and time consuming, including RTB hearings. In the end I kept one property and am waiting for the 2 years.Perfectly simple; property owner serves notice that they need property for their own use.
Oh now you wouldn't want to be going about evicting someone unless you have exceedingly valid grounds. And based on the tenant lying, he's not the type that will go quietly.The camera was mounted on the external wall, so I believe I was entitled to have it removed after asking and then warning them. I can’t be caught out over data protection rubbish that I didn’t want or ask for.
The act of passing around footage I think is harassment, so I think I’ll send him a termination based on anti social behaviour, harassing the neighbour.
I also think it could be that time is of the essence here. He’s complaining but he’s totally wrong, so go ahead and lodge a termination for bullying the neighbour, get ahead of him.
Oh now you wouldn't want to be going about evicting someone unless you have exceedingly valid grounds.
Thanks!And based on the tenant lying, he's not the type that will go quietly.
So how to approach it, ask the RTB by email if the grounds of anti social behaviour you state happened is a valid grounds for termination. And I'd say good luck with that.
Correct, you can't be, but the person who put the camera up, recorded other people and then shared the footage can be. DPC's guidance on private CCTV is quite clear that this is not permitted.I can’t be caught out over data protection rubbish that I didn’t want or ask for.
The act of passing around footage I think is harassment, so I think I’ll send him a termination based on anti social behaviour, harassing the neighbour.
Correct.Also, I believe that giving him the camera back rules out any nonsense claims about theft.
and if afterwards, you rent it to another tenant instead of using it yourself, would that not lead to you being open to being sued for false premises?Which is why I'd go for 'own use'; yes your tenants could overhold, but they don't have grounds to appeal notice.
Wouldn’t want to poke the DPC bear. Rather not get them involved.Might be too late now, but B submitting a complaint to the DPC in relation to A's illegal recording might help.
It is possible for a third party to make a complaint to the RTB over a tenants anti social behaviour. So perhaps the person being spied on could drop them a line?The camera was mounted on the external wall, so I believe I was entitled to have it removed after asking and then warning them. I can’t be caught out over data protection rubbish that I didn’t want or ask for.
The act of passing around footage I think is harassment, so I think I’ll send him a termination based on anti social behaviour, harassing the neighbour.
Also, I believe that giving him the camera back rules out any nonsense claims about theft.
The common area is outside of his demised premises, the suggestion we can’t remove anything from the external walls sounds to me like a double negative that solicitors dream up.
We don’t have to have a policy in place for every single thing, this is well established I’m sure.
For example; if there’s junk left in the carpark, I’m not obliged to leave it there.
Nothing for you to fear in this instance and a finding from them for illegal recording, or even putting tenant A on notice of a formal complaint could work in your favour.Wouldn’t want to poke the DPC bear. Rather not get them involved.
Which is why I'd go for 'own use'; yes your tenants could overhold, but they don't have grounds to appeal notice.
How? Theres no time restriction on own use.open to being sued for
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?