Do you mean legally or morally?If in writing, you can insist they remove themselves on the date they themselves said they were leaving.
I can understand the annoyance but unless the landlord has grounds for issuing his own notice of termination, I don't see that there's much that can be done.
Well, I didn't say it was "right", I just can't see any basis for a landlord enforcing a notice issued by his tenant.This can't be right. Could it now be called trespass? Anything? ... it's disgraceful that a landlord can be treated so abysmally.
I just can't see any basis for a landlord enforcing a notice issued by his tenant.
Yeah, I would too.If I was the landlord I'd be bucking.
Nothing.What's stopping the tenant doing the same thing in a few months time?
The RTA is silent on this, there is a long discussion on the legal thread of another forum for a case where tenant serves the termination notice and does not vacate (clearly the tenant is taking the proverbial p...) but I do not know if I can cross link. Case law for commercial tenancies is instead very clear: if tenant serves break notice, he/she has terminated the contract and has to leave. The RTA is silent except for Section 28: "(4) Despite the fact that such a notice of termination has been so served, that condition shall be regarded as satisfied if the notice is subsequently withdrawn." where a landlord can withdraw a termination notice served in the first 6 months and part 4 applies in this way.Do you mean legally or morally?
I'm not aware of any legal mechanism whereby a landlord can enforce a notice of termination issued by his tenant.
I can understand the annoyance but unless the landlord has grounds for issuing his own notice of termination, I don't see that there's much that can be done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?