Tax treatment of weddings by a company

I would say that it is common, but it's a very dangerous practice for all the reasons which Tommy pointed out.

If you make a once off payment, you will probably treat it ok. But if you pay an expense out of your company, and you don't account for it correctly, by accident, you would be very vulnerable if you have a revenue audit.

It's best to understand clearly the difference between a company and its directors and to manage their affairs separately.
 
Kildavin said:
There is absolutely nothing unusual in this at all. It happens in tens-of-thousands of companies across Ireland.
Click to expand...


Paddy199 said:
I totally agree with Mandelbrot.

Company credit cards can also be a complete nightmare. It might be year end before you get to sit down with the director and go through all this expenditure.
Click to expand...

Why on earth would anyone put themselves in the Revenue's firing line by being that stupid and disorganised?
I would never use company money or a company credit card for any personal bills or payments. Madness.
 
Purple said:
Why on earth would anyone put themselves in the Revenue's firing line by being that stupid and disorganised?
I would never use company money or a company credit card for any personal bills or payments. Madness.
Click to expand...

Madness, well we'll see after Her Majesty's Revenue investigate (Sunday Business Post yestereday). They want to look at all company spending by Sean Quinn. Things are getting a lot hotter in Cavan.
 
Purple said:
I would never use company money or a company credit card for any personal bills or payments. Madness.
Click to expand...
Seems there are people out there who do, i.e. the Stokes Brothers who spent €146,000 in personal expenses on company credit cards while their company was in difficulty, leaving creditors out of pocket. Looks like they got away with it with a very small wrap on the knuckles.
 
Bronte said:
Madness, well we'll see after Her Majesty's Revenue investigate (Sunday Business Post yestereday). They want to look at all company spending by Sean Quinn. Things are getting a lot hotter in Cavan.
Click to expand...

I don't think HM Revenue have any jurisdiction in Cavan?


Those boys' business practices are an example to nobody.
 
Bronte said:
We're not talking normal wedding here, where the daughter of a hotel owner absorbs say the catering and drinks cost which wouldn't be a very large figure really. But a wedding costing a million, wouldn't that be more of a gift tax wise.
Click to expand...

It was reported a few months back that a Company, sought to claim the VAT back on the cost of a wedding of a family member of a Director. The company owned the hotel that hosted the wedding and claimed the event was a marketing event.

Full article here;
http://www.independent.ie/opinion/analysis/tom-lyons-daughters-huge-wedding-bill-even-went-to-company-3154398.html
 
Luternau said:
It was reported a few months back that a Company, sought to claim the VAT back on the cost of a wedding of a family member of a Director.
Click to expand...

Very interesting Luternau, the link is not working. Did the company succeed in claiming back the VAT?

After one sees Starbucks paying not one pound of corporation tax on sales of millions in the UK, I've a feeling it's a lot more of a gain than VAT via the hotel for this wedding. I'm sure the Quinns have accountants as good as those of Starbucks.

(I'm not inferring any tax evasion - yet, so far tax avoidance - which is perfectly legal)
 
Bronte said:
You can live in Cavan and do business and declare tax in the six counties. As Quinn does/did.
Click to expand...

His application for bankruptcy in Northern Ireland was rejected on the basis that his main residence and centre of business interests were both located south of the border.
 
T McGibney said:
His application for bankruptcy in Northern Ireland was rejected on the basis that his main residence and centre of business interests were both located south of the border.
Click to expand...

My understanding is that this was the case at the time of the bankruptcy hearing. You need to show your centre of interest being in the UK for atleast 6 months in order to claim bankrupty in the UK, which Sean Quinn was unable to prove (or IBRC were able to disprove).

Quinn headquarters is in Derrylin, Co Fermanagh where Sean Quinn had his office and worked and therefore paid taxes in the UK. If the alleged payments were made from a UK company to its director(s) then HMRC would have jurisdiction regardless of where the director(s) are resident.
 
Bronte said:
Very interesting Luternau, the link is not working. Did the company succeed in claiming back the VAT?
Click to expand...

I will fix the link. The article did not state its sucess or otherwise.

Bronte said:
I'm sure the Quinns have accountants as good as those of Starbucks.
Click to expand...

I think Starbucks paying no corporation tax on UK profits is totally different to this, but I could be wrong on that.
 
Luternau said:
I will fix the link. The article did not state its sucess or otherwise.



I think Starbucks paying no corporation tax on UK profits is totally different to this, but I could be wrong on that.
Click to expand...

Ok the link now works. How would the Independant know that the Quinn company tried to claim back the VAT.

My comparison with Starbucks is to point out that the wealthist people and companies can hire the best accountants, who are 'generally' able to keep one step ahead of revenue and therefore these companies seem to get away with paying a lot less tax than one would expect. Revenue have respect for the big 4 accountancy firms and indeed are sounded out by the big 4. To see what can and cannot fly.
 
Bronte said:
Revenue have respect for the big 4 accountancy firms and indeed are sounded out by the big 4. To see what can and cannot fly.
Click to expand...

Supporting link please.

(I think you'll find its the other way around (s.811TCA1997))
 
Kildavin said:
Supporting link please.

(I think you'll find its the other way around (s.811TCA1997))
Click to expand...

I don't need a link, I was in the office of one of the big 4 firms in the last 12 months (a tricky tax issue) and they have direct one on one contact with the tops in revenue.
 
Bronte said:
I don't need a link, I was in the office of one of the big 4 firms in the last 12 months (a tricky tax issue) and they have direct one on one contact with the tops in revenue.
Click to expand...

You'd have to wonder about the ethics of that sort of carry-on. Its all about who you know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register