I understood that if you sold a PPR in order to purchase a new PPR than CGT would not be applicable.
If you sell a property that was
always your
PPR and is disposed of within 12 months of vacating it then any gain is exempt from
CGT regardless of what you do with the money. However the scenarios that you mention don't necessarily fall into this category - e.g. if you don't dispose of the first (current
PPR) property within 12 months of vacating it and moving into the second (inherited) property then some portion of any eventual resale gain will be assessable for
CGT. And I'm not sure if there could be some
CGT chargeable on the eventual sale of the inherited house even if you move into it as your
PPR. It may depend on when you inherited it and what it has been used for in the meantime. You should get professional advice on at least this but probably the overall tax situation.
The fact that in order to purchase the new PPR involves having to sell the 2 properties, surely this rule still applies?
I don't understand - the original query is about two and not three properties.
Update: sorry - I just re-read the last line and see that the eventual plan would be to sell both and buy a new
PPR. This is still irrelevant to the
CGT issue. If any
CGT liability arises on either or both of the properties then these are dealt with in isolation and there is no exemption/relief for rolling the proceeds into a new
PPR.