I'm not sure if there's a more appropriate forum for this, if there is I'd appreciate it if someone could move this thread?
I'm doing a paper on neofunctionalism and supranational governance. I've got a pretty firm grasp on neofunctionalism but the question wants me to conpare it to supranational governance. I was under the illusion that neofunctionalism was a school of thought within supranational governance rather than them being two different approaches.
Some of the key aspects fo neofunctionalism that I'm critiquing are;
Nationalism causes war
The spillover effect of economic policies into other aspects of infrastructure and society
The importance of a central institution
Values gradually shift to an EU level rather than local government
So I get the impression that supranational governance is NOT a grand theory but then I don't what it technically is? If anyone could shed the light on the key differences and similarities between the two I'd really appreciate it!