Couple it with a Lean Manufacturing course, or Kaizen techniques, then you are adding useful skills as a manufacturing engineer.
I've read up quite a bit on Kaizen techniques (or events) and lean manufacturing... how do they differ from "talking it through" and "common sense"?
By and large they don't, been through a number of LSS projects and whereas the methodology is useful, it's nothing that common sense and some thinking that any competent manager should be able to do. To me they are just buzz words for the latest hot management topic, replacing things like JIT (just in time) and ISO 9000 as "must haves" for executives with more money then sense
Might look good on a CV if you want to get into consulting
Yea, that's my view as well. I can see the value of ISO 9000 as it establishes an audit trail without imposing a one size fits all structure.
Problem with ISO 9000 and any of these techniques is that they can become more bother then they are worth. I remember working for a multinational and when we ended up having check sheets to control our checksheets, I lost any faith in it
That's more to do with a bad quality engineer than doesn't understand the basic ISO requirments.
While it is true that the mythical common sense will get you some way towards optimisation, an understanding of statistical methods and analysis gets you even further and prevents going down misleading avenues (I have done a lot of numerical analysis to support business decisions and the results were often not what a lot of the experienced managers expected. Which is why I was asked to produce rigorous analysis in the first place; they knew that there was enough complexity there that intuition, experience and common sense were not enough). Six sigma is a set of tools, which, if understood have a lot of scope for optimisation, increase in quality and cost reduction. But you can't blindly follow them - you have to engage the brain.
By the way, they are applicable to the software industry too, but you need to be selective and careful in the implementation. A qualification in itself will not get anyone a pay rise by default, and why should it? But demonstrating results as a result of learning new methods is a better bet for a pay rise any day.
I had a customer in high volume manufacturing who thought 6-Sigma was great. It took 8 weeks and a green-belt project to show him that it was a waste of time
So they thought it was all great (which part exactly, I wonder?) without actually doing the analysis. The whole point of the 6 sigma approach is the numerical analysis. But I agree that if it is used a a blind cribsheet it does not have much value. And a bit of training does not make one a good analyst - this takes experience and, as I said before, being critical and engaging the brain.
The problem was that they were asking us to draw conclusions from small batch runs so the numerical analysis would have been next to worthless.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?