Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,818
Another regulator getting into minutiae instead of properly doing its job.At first glance I saw €246K.
Just €246 seems very reasonable.
Complaint was lodged by client - they have to address it.Another regulator getting into minutiae instead of properly doing its job.
No they don't. It's not their job to referee petty fee disputes.Complaint was lodged by client - they have to address it.
they don't get to just 'ignore' complaints. there's a decision process to determine if a complaint is admissible and they have to follow that process, regardless of how small an issue you believe it to be, it wasn't a small issue to the client.No they don't. It's not their job to referee petty fee disputes.
It was still a small issue. The primary roles of the LSRA are to ensure that there are processes in place to confront and resolve cases of malpractice within the legal profession and also to safeguard money held on client accounts maintained by solicitors.they don't get to just 'ignore' complaints. there's a decision process to determine if a complaint is admissible and they have to follow that process, regardless of how small an issue you believe it to be, it wasn't a small issue to the client.
It was still a small issue. The primary roles of the LSRA are to ensure that there are processes in place to confront and resolve cases of malpractice within the legal profession and also to safeguard money held on client accounts maintained by solicitors.
It is, again, not to referee petty disputes like this.
It's interesting that some people want regulators to worry about small rather than major malpractice.
The same sort of people who say things like this?Who would those people be now, T McG?
It's interesting that some people are relaxed about a certain level of malpractice.
Why use one word ("you") when you can use ten?The same sort of people who say things like this?
Dramatic effect.Why use one word ("you") when you can use ten?
It's interesting that some people are relaxed about a certain level of malpractice.
Absolutely.It's equally interesting to note that some people appear to want everything for free, irrespective of the actual cost to the service provider!
I would consider it wholly legitimate of a solicitor to levy a small charge for storing a valuable document in his or her safe or strong room for a number of years.
It's equally interesting to note that some people appear to want everything for free....
The report quoted by Brendan is itself ample evidence that the LSRA claimant in this case wanted a will storage service for free.Again, I'd be interested if you have any evidence to support that comment.
Unfair.It seems certain posters are happy to simply make things up!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?