B
No chance any of the members of the management company might be a solicitor or have contacts that might be able to help out possibly at a discount? One solicitor resident/member of our management company once gave some free advice to the company on a specific matter although she did not want to be engaged on an ongoing basis. Just mentioning it in case it's an option and not ruled out through possible conflicts of interest etc...
Hi,
I was just wondering if anyone could recommend a good solicitor based on the Northside or in the city centre, who could advise the directors of a recently taken over property management company. Specifically issues such as non-payment of management company fees by some tenants, what would happen if the company was to be stricken off (resulting in potential titles issues) and so forth.
All advice greatly appreciated.
Regards
Bill
If the company is struck it will have to be reinstated which will involve accountants fees,solicitors and barristers fees...so dont let it get struck offSeriously if you do, all those non service charge paying owners will suddenly be very interested in the management companies affairs when they cant sell their apartments until the whole reinstatement process has gone through.
Does the management company engage and management agent to deal with day to day matters and who might be able to provide the legal advice indirectly? As far as I know our management agent deals with stuff like chasing those in arrears and enforcing the house rules etc.
I would suggest one of the large debt collection firms might do it as they employ legal execs to do the work.
There was a recent thread about this issue of management companies listing/"publishing" names of those in arrears although it was not that conclusive on some of the issues...Also some companies now publish lists of the defaulters a name and shame thing but you better get your facts spot on if you do this as libel cases are much more profitable apparently(ps im from mayo)
The specialist firms charge literally every time they pick up your file even if only to write to you to tell you that nothing has happened. Thats not a criticism of them ,its simply the only way you can make money out of debt collection particularly at district court level(which is where most service charge cases would be). ( and this is why most solicitors dont want to do that work.. its not that they dont make a big profit from it rather they dont make any profit from this type of work when you look at amount of time involved) The problem is you will almost certainly not recover other than a small percentage of the legal costs because generally speaking the costs that are awarded in debt type cases in the district cout are governed by a fees order(scale costs) that is seriously out of date and bears no reality to the celtic pussycat.
This is what the non payers bank on. The only way to improve the position generally is to take a few cases all the way and when you get judgement register that as a judgement mortgage against the property. They last about 6 years?? so at least you knpw that if they try to sell or remortgage in those 6 years they have to pay. Also court interest runs from the day you get judgement so you should get them in the end.
Other defaulters may decide its easier to pay up if they see you being tough and equally important is that the honest punctual payers dont get so fed up that they stop paying also.
Also some companies now publish lists of the defaulters a name and shame thing but you better get your facts spot on if you do this as libel cases are much more profitable apparently(ps im from mayo)
Whatever about those in arrears (what percentage of annual turnover are the arrears?) this may point to the need to increase management charges to beef up the sinking funds set aside for such contingencies. Of course this won't go down well with those who are paying on time while there are others not bothering...but would not be in a financial position to deal with any maintenance problems or the like. Fighting a protracted legal battle to force people to settle up would be out of the question.
Has it ever happened that somebody in arrears has sold up and then had to clear their arrears as they should? We had one case where this did not happen in spite of it supposedly not being possible!My concern is that many of those in debt simply will not have the money to pay what they owe.
I wonder if you can get this information elsewhere - e.g. from one of the sites that discusses management companies, their legal standing and possible legislative changes in this regard? For example ConsumerConnect has some information that could be useful.- Talk to a solicitor who can outline the direct legal implications should the company be declared insolvent (perhaps a letter from the solicitor detailing the same of which we can send copies to the residents).
Is the company not already adding interest and collection/legal fees to the arrears? Ours does.- Send out letters to residents asking them to settle their bills. Outline exactly what will happen if the company is stricken off. An indication that we will begin to charge interest on unpaid debts might encourage some to pay up.
As I mentioned before there is an existing thread discussing this but there were divergent views on the issue.- Send out letters using a "name and shame" policy in the hope this will encourage even more to pay up.
Can you explain this please? I thought that the management agent was gone?I'm afraid that we will once again be in the same stand-off position as the management agent.
Can you explain this please? I thought that the management agent was gone?
However, many residents claim they are refusing to pay the service fees because they perceive the service delivered to be poor or non-existent. The management agent claimed that while fees remain unpaid they could only concentrate on paying essentials such as lighting and insurance and provided no maintenance of the common areas. Given the precarious state of current finances it is unlikely we will be able to do anything to improve the service delivered without significantly bolstering the account through increasing the fees for the residents who are paying or collecting the somehow collecting unpaid debts.
Arrears currently amount to approximately 50% of turnover. The sinking fund contains roughly the same amount, which must now be used to pay upcoming bills for insurance and refuse collection. That will pretty much wipe out the sinking fund hence my concern that we be fully briefed on the implications of insolvency for the company.
I'll have to examine the accounts in greater detail but the management agent did mention that it looks like one or two people bought and notified them of a change of ownership despite the unpaid bills. Their understanding was that the cut price conveyancing solicitors sometimes ignore these issues. However, this bill would fall due on the new owner.
You mean sell up?So get out now(while your sanity is still intact)>
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?