You should have structured this differently at the time, perhaps as a licence agreement where their occupancy of the property and the rights attending thereto fell short of that entailed in a tenancy. The presumed quid pro quo for this was the sharp discount in the rent payable.Most of the people viewing have been investors but are put off by the fact that I rented to in-law family at 60% of market value for the 2 years before sale. In truth as
Was this registered with the RTB?but are put off by the fact that I rented to in-law family at 60% of market value for the 2 years before sale.
Yes, I was wary of a tax bill racking up or penalties or both so once it became apparent it wasn't the short term fix I expected I registered and back dated to when they moved in.Was this registered with the RTB?
Thanks Brendan, do you know why the rules were brought in? I can't imagine it was to stop people renting to those who can't afford market price at a fairer rate. You'd think they could allow that exception as I'm sure it happens pretty frequently, seems to either penalise someone trying to keep someone housed who doesn't have any other options, or force people to bend the rules by getting the discount back in cash. I don't understand it at all, is it the loss of tax on the profit made from the rent at market rate?So the problem is not caused by the rent rules but by the banks' reluctance to lend for one bed apartments to home owners.
Of course, if the stupid rent rules did not exist, investors would be prepared to pay more.
Brendan
Most of the people viewing have been investors
This doesn't add up.nearly half of the people viewing have been investors.
Maybe your asking price is simply too high and doesn't reflect the actual market value?I'm selling a 1 bed apartment and have had an offer €10K below asking, no more bids yet, on sale for 4 weeks.
Sorry you're right, meant to say 'more than half'. Bear in mind I'm parroting back what agent is telling me, no idea first hand of course what's happening but I think agent is doing his best.This doesn't add up.
Maybe your asking price is simply too high and doesn't reflect the actual market value?
My question is if there are any tactics to mitigate this issue
The estate agent is best placed to advise on your original question.Bear in mind I'm parroting back what agent is telling me, no idea first hand of course what's happening but I think agent is doing his best.
I would agree with this.So you’ve got an offer of €340k on a property with an asking price of €350k. Is that right?
If so, I would grab the offer with both hands!
What the property might have achieved last April is irrelevant.
Probably due to the relatively heavy losses by that particular segment of the market during the bust, 1 bed units lost a very significant level of value - around 70% of such apartments were bought as rental properties, and I suspect banks may also still believe that a significant FTB segment may be buying 1 bed units with the intention of holding it as a rental unit later on, while buying a larger home. But that is just my guess, it could also be because the value of the loans are generally smaller than typical houses & profits are lower?Thanks Brendan, do you know why the rules were brought in? I can't imagine it was to stop people renting to those who can't afford market price at a fairer rate. You'd think they could allow that exception as I'm sure it happens pretty frequently, seems to either penalise someone trying to keep someone housed who doesn't have any other options, or force people to bend the rules by getting the discount back in cash. I don't understand it at all, is it the loss of tax on the profit made from the rent at market rate?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?