Most schools are not public sector. They are privately owned (usually by the parish or a religious organisation) and the board of management are responsible for recruitment, even though the State foots the bill.A lot of the public sector jobs especially in schools in this country are administered to people who know either the principal or someone on the board of management. In my view it's ethically wrong however, we are living in Ireland and lagging behind our European counterparts in terms of ethics!
Are schools really private organisations, though? If they are funded by the state, then surely there is an argument that they are at least semi-public? One for Joe Duffy tomorrow afternoon, perhaps....
That's great for you. But what's that got to do with this discussion?Complainer, I have a job thank goodness!
Yes, they are private - mostly. VECs and community schools/colleges are state operated, but most other schools are privately owned.Are schools really private organisations, though? If they are funded by the state, then surely there is an argument that they are at least semi-public? One for Joe Duffy tomorrow afternoon, perhaps....
I'm often amazed how people seem convinced that recruitment or procurement exercises are corrupt because they don't get the job. If you don't have the inside information on the full range of candidates/suppliers that were available, then it is really unfair to allege corruption. Your grades/credentials/references may be great, but the other guy's stuff might be even greater.
What organisations are you talking about, Bigbird?
There are lots of non-public sector people covered by the Croke Park agreement, including school staff, and staff in independent health providers (e.g. Rehab, Enable) where the Govt ultimately pays for the service.if church schools ( as most schools are) are not public sector, does that mean teachers are not public sector employees?. Do they pay the public sector levy rates (indeed do school secretaries)?. Why did the teaching trade unions have a vote in the Croke Park agreeement if their members were not public sectors employees?
Yeah I agree complainer even though it's not part of' civil service' recruitment process it's still taxpayers money which pay for the staff invovled in these privately owned schools. as a result I feel that he recruitment process should not be in the hands of board of management. the process has to change. yeah i know it's fair play for staff in the civil service. perhaps I misunderstood your post originally. i thought you were suggesting that employees in schools had nothing to do with the public sector. can we put that point to bed as i want to focus on things like nepotism etc.? (as in previous post)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?