They can, but are not obliged to.Clothes shops cannot give cash refunds if someone changes their mind.
The dress is fit for purpose, it's just not fit for your wife.
I can just imagine the response you'd get if you tried this argument in Penneys.
Can you confirm which particular section of the Act you got this from? I understood that the consumer rights were generally repair/replace/refund, in that order.I had a quick look at the sale of goods act and you are entitled to a refund if the clothing item is not fit for its purpose.
If there was a small hole in the dress it wouldn't be of acceptable qualityIf there was a small hole in the dress it wouldnt be of merchantable quality
I find most retails get pretty upset when I try on dresses, mind you.
No, she did not try on the dress. The shop was busy at the time and she did not get an opportunity.
I agree the fit for its purpose covers the general functionality of the item purchased. However, this can be interpretted a little differently depending on what way you look at it. The overall purpose was that the dress would fit correctly and could be worn comfortably. This was not the case.
By the by - has your wife tried on a bigger size of the dress? It might be a better fit, and then she could use the credit note to buy that instead.
Dear me, are you trying to incite a divorce?!
Personally, I would think she should have tried it on first (apparently this is not common practice for women for some unknown reason)
You obviously haven't been in a ladies' changing room recently then (actually, if you're male, I certainly HOPE you haven't been!) There's always a mile-long queue, which is probably why some women take a chance on buying the item without trying it on. I personally always try things on, because sizes vary so much from shop to shop.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?