... I'm sorry (and based on personal experience I find it very surprising) to hear of the difficulties in communications with Revenue which I am at a loss to try and explain.
It might come down to something very simple: a clash between the taxpayer and one individual Revenue staff member (and I'm not suggesting who might have got the tone wrong: it might be either, or it might be both).
Surely by the quote below the accountant was responsible? I'm surprised the accountant didn't check the balancing statements when he was told the client got a refund they weren't expecting.
Revenue made the error but that doesn't excuse the fact that the accountant didn't follow up on concens by the client!
QUOTE>>Taxpayer was surprised to receive rebates and asked accountant were they correct and was told yes.
Please clarify what method was used.
On your post 15/01/10- It is Individual
On your Post 24/03/10- It is Separtely Assessed
You have separate assessment v separate treatment(single individual) which are two different methods
If as per post 24/03/10 it is Separtely Assessed as per accountant written on form- The wife could get the unused credits bands from other spouse
Please take a read of link of different methods and what method was written on form
http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/it/cred....html#section6
How is the husband being treated in This?
What is the position with Husband, Did he get married credit as well, or did he overpay tax at his side
You would nearly want to be looking at both assessments at same time
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?