Of course Nelly,
If I (and others like me) decided to have a few children, & give up work or go part time there would be less taxes paid and less funds to subsidise all the women who do have children.
Nelly wrote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Margie
That's exactly my point. I really feel that you've hit the point there. It's all about retaining key staff members like myself.
that may be your point but the reality is that folks are in business to make money not provide people with nice jobs with wonderful perks.
as for retaining key members of staff - i think providing pension contribution to a certain % for all staff would be a better stab at retaining employees than offering mat benefits as they would apply to all, and as this seems to be the first time maternity leave has been requested
Margie - no offence but your not the first person to have state mat and not be sibsidised to the tune of your origional wages and you won't be the last.
you are wrong.Nelly,
You must not be very confident in yourself making sarcastic one liner remarks. In all you have, you must not be very happy.
I question if you actually are confident, because if you are/were there seems to be no reason why with your qualifications (a qualified accountant ?) that you should not be earning a much higher wage right after conferring- unless you did not ask for it or want to go out and set up your own business etc.In spite of all that has happened to me, I remain a nice person, and I have confidence in myself.
not your choices but the thought process involved in coming to them.I don't feel the need to ridicule other peoples choices, yet you and other posters have ridiculed my choices.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?