Repossession is a valid outcome for someone in arrears


It's as lazy as the argument that not guaranteeing Anglo-Irish would have stopped ATM's running, even though Anglo-Irish didn't actually have any ATM's.
 
Wish I was you. Never made a mistake in your life.
Many people made what ate now obvious errors of judgement in mortgage. Then lost job and now facing eviction and/or emmigration.
Where is your compassion?
 
Wish I was you. Never made a mistake in your life.
Many people made what ate now obvious errors of judgement in mortgage. Then lost job and now facing eviction and/or emmigration.
Where is your compassion?
Where is your compassion for those who carefully avoided risk and are now being scolded for not jumping into the boiling hot water too?
i.e. drop the appeal to emotion please and try to base your argument on something approaching sense.

P.S. You know nothing of my personal circumstances. For all you know, I might be the proud owner of a neg equity shoebox but I'm keeping up the repayments and not attempting to pull strokes to get somebody else to pay it for me.
 
In your world we would still gave hanging and deportation for petty crime.
I know that some people are what they call strategic defaulters but in my experience most are genuine. One could say that a young couple were foolish to take out s mortgage based on both earning and never anticipated job loss for one or even worse for both.
I don't know of a good solution but I do know eviction is bad for society as a whole. All it will do is a) drive some to suicide and b) will end up costing more in the long run as whether you like it or not we are a social democracy aiming to help ALL our citizens, not just those wise virgins who kept oil for their lamps.
 
So if a bank repossesses, they may soon have no outlet to sell the property

http://www.independent.ie/irish-new...event-unnecessary-repossessions-29580169.html

Whats people's view on this?
Surely there's a anti-competitiveness angle to this, especially if say all the other EA's signed similar agreements.
Why would anyone possibly consider paying their mortgage on their PPR if this new agreement works....you just have to say you don't want to leave your PPR, and your untouchable.
And this only makes more problems for the banks, possibly leading to more funding being needed (as it's clearly debt forgiveness that Hall is alluding to above)....so all will pay to keep the minority in their unaffordable houses or give them 100% clean slates if they walk away.
And do Buy to Lets fall into this?

Another sad day in the banama republic