Thanks for that.
So ....
If, for the sake of argument, one had been non-compliant regarding rental income tax in say 2006 (but fully compliant in all subsequent years), that outstanding tax from 2006 + penalties + interest would hang over him (and increase) forever, should the taxman ever see fit to audit him that far back ... and discover the non-compliance (fraud)?
And final theoretical question, to what degree (in monetary terms) is it more beneficial for an individual to voluntarily declare a 6-yr-old tax default, than for the taxman to investigate and find it himself?
Just wondering ......