Rent to Buy between private individuals

losttheplot

Registered User
Messages
604
Is it possible for a rent to buy scheme to be completed by private individuals. For example someone buys a house, agrees to sell to another person who will live in it and pay off the purchase price on a monthly basis over a number of years.

All the information I've found on it refers to builders and developers.
 
What is a rent to buy scheme? Essentially the owner agrees to rent the property to a tenant and then enters into an option with the tenant to sell them the property at an agreed price and time. Can 't see why you can't do that.
 
You seem to be suggesting that I sell a house to you for deferred consideration over a long number of years. No legal reason why you could not do that.

Not sure how it would be treated for tax purposes.
 
You can do it, but it would be a legal minefield and either side is taking a big risk .

If we assume that the tenant pays rent for 30 years and does not get ownership until then. No-one in their right mind would go for this, unless their legal rights were water-tight.

On the other hand, if ownership passes at the beginning of the deal, the seller is handing over a valuable asset with few guarantees of getting their money.
If they charge interest then they are acting as an illegal money-lender

Either way, what happens if during the lifetime of the deal one of the people dies / gets married ( family home protection act issues) / gets divorced and their assets are being divided up by the courts / goes bankrupt and their assets are being divided up by the courts / skips the country / refuses to pay.

No idea what the tax implications are. Rent is taxed income.

no, cant see it being a good deal for anyone,
 

In a rent to buy scheme part of the periodic payment is treated as rent and part of it is a deposit - and AFAIK the tax treatment also follows this.

If a proper contractual arrangement is in place then there's no reason why a solicitor would need to hold any of the money - if the buyer doesn't exercise their option by the required time then the seller retains the "deposit", and on the other side the seller doesn't have any option to pull out - presumably the buyer's option is a burden (or whatever the correct legal term is) on the property.
 
Thanks for the replies. It seems to be as complicated as I thought (legally and tax wise). It was idea to help out a relative who would not get a mortgage due to age. Back to the drawing board I think.