G
Guest28
Guest
My partner and I recently applied for Rent Allowance. I am on Back to Education Allowance and she is on Jobseekers Allowance. We both receive the top rate payment of 204.30 a week. From what I can gather, this is due to my payment being a stand alone payment that does not count as means. The SW website states
All training allowances received by the spouse/partner are disregarded in the assessment of means.
When we received our rent supplement however, we were told that as we are on the top payments we were only entitled to a reduced rate, as the SWA income limit is 339 per household. With the payment they are giving us, things are very tight, especially as I am not in receipt of a maintenance grant.
However, we think that there may have been an error as the SW website states that income in excess of the SWA limit, that is from a BTEA payment falls under the Additional Income Disregard when calculating the rent supplement. In that case, surely we are entitled to a higher Rent supplement, as this was not taken into account by the CWO?
Can anyone shed any light on whether my thinking is correct, and if it is worth appealing the current payment?
All training allowances received by the spouse/partner are disregarded in the assessment of means.
When we received our rent supplement however, we were told that as we are on the top payments we were only entitled to a reduced rate, as the SWA income limit is 339 per household. With the payment they are giving us, things are very tight, especially as I am not in receipt of a maintenance grant.
However, we think that there may have been an error as the SW website states that income in excess of the SWA limit, that is from a BTEA payment falls under the Additional Income Disregard when calculating the rent supplement. In that case, surely we are entitled to a higher Rent supplement, as this was not taken into account by the CWO?
Can anyone shed any light on whether my thinking is correct, and if it is worth appealing the current payment?