Does anyone have any opinions on whether u are better to go with an irish provider (like standard life / avviva) etc for a lump sum investment, or with rabodirect who seem to have a decent charging structure but the funds are offshore in luxembourg?
I am aware of the need to do your own tax calcs if you exit a fund
However, do you have to declare the existance of these annually to revenue or only when you make a gain on disposal?
Will you be subject to extra scrutiny from revenue by having one in the first place?
In the current uncertain climate / possible demise euro, are you better being "offshore" or "onshore"??
Thanks in advance
any fund invested through rabbo will devalue along with our new currency
is this correct? Rabo is protected by the Dutch Govt I thought so why would funds bought thru them get devalued to the Irish Peso?
Roy
Rabo's contract is to pay you in euro. Not Irish euro as there is no such thing. For Rabo to pay you in anything else it would need a government decree absolving them of their euro liabilities and making them punt nuas. Why would our government give a foreign bank such a windfall profit at Irish citizens' expense?if you buy into them through rabbo in this country , the principal is no different to having deposits in rabbo in ireland , if you have savings with rabbo in ireland , were we to leave the euro , savings with rabbo will adopt to a new currency
Rabo's contract is to pay you in euro. Not Irish euro as there is no such thing. For Rabo to pay you in anything else it would need a government decree absolving them of their euro liabilities and making them punt nuas. Why would our government give a foreign bank such a windfall profit at Irish citizens' expense?
if you buy into them through rabbo in this country , the principal is no different to having deposits in rabbo in ireland , if you have savings with rabbo in ireland , were we to leave the euro , savings with rabbo will adopt to a new currency
There you go. Rabo are confirming what I said. Say the Punt Nua is worth 50c then the price of the Rabo XYZ fund, currently say €1 would be repriced as 2PN; similarly a €1,000 deposit would be converted too 2,000PN. What is suggested is that a €1,000 deposit or a €1,000 mortgage with an Irish bank would, by decree, be converted to 1,000PN each. This is not a change in currency it is a decreed change in contract law. The Irish government is powerless to change the value of the euro just as it is powerless to change sterling or the dollar. But it could by decree say all euro, sterling and dollar contracts written under Irish law will henceforth be interpreted as being in XPN, YPN and ZPN respectively. It was completely different when all contracts were in Irish punts, it was within the government's gift to dictate the exchange rate of the punt.by that criteria , deposits with rabbo in ireland would retain thier value in euro as opposed to the punt nua and this isnt the case , rabbo told me that were we to exit the euro , investment funds bought through them would follow the same principal as deposit with rabbo in ireland
Why would our government give a foreign bank such a windfall profit at Irish citizens' expense?
There you go. Rabo are confirming what I said. Say the Punt Nua is worth 50c then the price of the Rabo XYZ fund, currently say €1 would be repriced as 2PN; similarly a €1,000 deposit would be converted too 2,000PN. What is suggested is that a €1,000 deposit or a €1,000 mortgage with an Irish bank would, by decree, be converted to 1,000PN each. This is not a change in currency it is a decreed change in contract law. The Irish government is powerless to change the value of the euro just as it is powerless to change sterling or the dollar. But it could by decree say all euro, sterling and dollar contracts written under Irish law will henceforth be interpreted as being in XPN, YPN and ZPN respectively. It was completely different when all contracts were in Irish punts, it was within the government's gift to dictate the exchange rate of the punt.
As I said before, to allow Rabo to write down its Irish liabilities whilst all its assets are in € would be to hand them a windfall profit at Irish citizens' expense.
Anyway, see other posts of mine:
WE ARE NOT GOING TO EXIT THE EURO AND DEVALUE
And in 1993, the Irish government announced overnight that the punt was worth 15% less. There is a huge difference between changing the exchange rate of your currency and changing the actual currency itself. Anyone with a euro deposit in any bank has a contractual entitlement to euros. Similarly if they had a dollar deposit or a sterling deposit. The government could launch its Punt Nua at an exchange rate of 50c. But it would be a huge and completely unprecedented step to decree that banks could convert their deposit liabilities to Punt nua from euro at a 1 for 1 exchange rate even though the actual exchange rate would be 50c.when argentina defaulted in 2001 , thier peso went from 1:1 to the dollar to 3:1 to the dollar , anyone who had the equivelent og 12 thousand dollars in pesos on a friday , ended up with the equivelent of 4 thousand dollars by monday , were we to exit the euro , the same would happen here , you seem to believe that someone with ten thousand euro would end up with twenty thousand punt nua , id be of the opinion that someone with ten thousand euro would end up with ten thousand punt nua
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?