S
I know its not easy to terminate the tenancy so I'm not going to do anything about it for a while but in a shared house when a room is vacant its surely not always possible to give 24 hours notice?
This is very short notice..I texted the two occupants to say that I'd be calling in an hour to show the house.
Over-ruling of PRTB decision "Tribunal Reference Number TR10/DR532&589/2006 which was posted on their own website.facetious - I'm a bit confused on the following..
If Saffron's tenants have no connection with each other and have different starting dates of tenancy are you sure that the laws and rules that you mention apply to them in exactly the same way as if they had jointly rented the property on one common tenancy agreement. ?
Have not each of Saffron's tenants basically only rented a bedroom plus use of common areas such as kitchen and bathroom. They did not agreednor were asked to pay for the whole property as opposed to normal tenancy agreements where , regardless of the failure of one tenant to pay, the landlord is still legally entitled to the whole rent. The two remaining persons in Saffron's property are not entitled to exclusive use of the common areas or the empty bedroom.
The "peaceful enjoyment" of their property therefore must therefore be looked at in a different light from a group who have together rented a property and are obliged to pay for it.
As each individual is seperate from the other, is only paying for exclusive occupation of a bedroom , knows full well that other unconnected individuals can use the common areas and also knows that three persons are expected to use the premises why should they raise an objection to a third person entering peacefully at any time, with or without notice ?
Many thanks for the compliment.Gosh, you know your stuff, Facetious.
Actually, I was quite confused on the aspect of registration and you've cleared it up .I didn't know about the reversal of the original weird decision.
What do you reckon on my feelings (not facts, just suspicion) that the two tenants who are only responsible for their part of the rent should not complain about a LL showing a potential third person ?
I'm pretty sure if they were legally liable to pay the whole rent they'd be damn happy to get a third person in asap.
Anyway, Facetious -admit it -you're the head of PRTB working undercover !
What if the landlord keeps a room in the house for occasion use for themselves and rents out other rooms on a share basis with bills in landlords name? If for example they live in another part of the country?
Whose names are the bills in at the rental poster?
Great reply.. Can you explain the first para above as I cant grasp it.Once there is a tenancy agreement in place with even one tenant in a shared house situation, a landlord cannot commence having a licensee agreement with any other occupants as by the tenancy agreement he does not have continuing access to any part of the property.
RTA2004 tenancy laws and the services of the PRTB are not applicable to them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?