AMC reduction is based on the PRSA value, not the value in each fundOr is the AMC reduced in all funds you are invested in once all the money you have in your PRSA AVC is > 100k.
It certainly wouldn't concern me. I think that all of the PRSAs that I've had to date have been non-standard and over the years the charges are only going in one direction - downwards. And if RLI were to increase their charges to make them less competitive then one can just switch to another cheaper provider. In my opinion the standard PRSA charging caps of 5% on contributions and 1% AMC are largely moot since nobody in their right mind would pay such high charges these days.RoyalLondon.ie only offer non-standard PRSA, are there any concerns with that?
Mind you, I didn't consider the case of investing in more than one fund. I didn't confirm if that 100k threshold applies to each fund you are invested in separately. Or is the AMC reduced in all funds you are invested in once all the money you have in your PRSA AVC is > 100k. I'll have to get back on to them!
I think that all of the PRSAs that I've had to date have been non-standard and over the years the charges are only going in one direction - downwards.
It could be in many cases.Is this Royal London PRSA the "winner" these days when it comes to PRSA costs?
However it may also be possible to get 0.4% (but no equivalent of RLI's ValueShare discretionary bonus) with Standard Life in some cases these days?Taking into account their "ValueShare" scheme of 0.13% in recent years, the AMC may be effectively reduced to 0.42% or significantly lower (0.32%) for larger transfers.
There are a few issues to be aware of that others have mentioned earlier. In particular...Any pitfalls to be careful of here?
See here:just need to find an Equity Index tracker to park all the funds in)
Just curious - when and why did you go with Davy rather than a life insurance company?I have a ~100k PRSA with Davy [ execution only ] but believe I should be trying to move it elsewhere as Davy have priced themselves out?
The whole fund.Hi C-Pike. Once you have > €100,000 in there, does the rebate apply to the whole fund or just the portion of the fund in excess of €100,000?
30 years from retirement into an equity fund - by my calculation Standard Life is the winner. Their range of Vanguard index funds are priced at 0.9%, so the rebate gets you to 0.4% immediately without profit share etc maybe doing the work (if I'm understanding the Royal London offering properly).Any pitfalls to be careful of here?
I have a ~100k PRSA with Davy [ execution only ] but believe I should be trying to move it elsewhere as Davy have priced themselves out?
Is this Royal London PRSA the "winner" these days when it comes to PRSA costs?
(30 years from retirement - just need to find an Equity Index tracker to park all the funds in)
Depends on what you're looking for presumably?
I think we are all mostly of the mindset that a Global, passively managed, 100% ETF approach is best for long term growth and those were the 2 products that seemed to tick the boxes to my eye.RL BlackRock Developed World Equity Index Fund
or maybe
RL Global Equity Diversified Fund
RL BlackRock Developed World Equity Index Fund is passive while RL Global Equity Diversified Fund is active.I think we are all mostly of the mindset that a Global, passively managed, 100% ETF approach is best for long term growth and those were the 2 products that seemed to tick the boxes to my eye.
I initiated the transfer from SL to RLI this week so should be with them soon.I'm not with them yet but am currently planning to move to them.
Are there any circumstances in which an ARF might be preferable to a vested PRSA, or vice versa, assuming all other things being equal (e.g. same charges and asset/fund allocation options and same level of customer service etc.)? I'm thinking in terms of tax benefits (presumably no difference?), timing of mandatory drawdowns (ditto?), differences in flexibility, inheritance planning, etc.?Not relevant to a DC scheme. PRSAs can be 'vested', with the pension lump sum paid and the remaining policy acting the same as a ln ARF. For a DC scheme, a new post retirement product is needed.
This seems to be incorrect?A point that is worth emphasising given that most of the Mutuals operating in the Irish Market were taken out during the great "carpet-bagging bonanza" in the early noughties. Royal Liver's "Value Share" appears to be a genuine attempt to make an element of "With Profits" available. In April 2024 the benefit amounted to .13% policies active on the 31st December 2023. This applies to Personal Retirement Bond (PRB) and Approved Retirement Fund (ARF) products, but apparently not PRSAs. More here.
So hopefully that clears this up...ValueShare, a unique feature that is offered exclusively to Royal London Ireland Approved Retirement Fund, Personal Retirement Bond and Personal Retirement Savings Account customers.
I believe going forward PRSAs will all be valid policies for ValueShare.
Let's hope so. It would clinch the deal for me.
That’s been updated. I specifically checked it on the day I posted the above. Good news indeed.This seems to be incorrect?
There used to be some differences, but I believe these have all been done away with. I would expect to be able to get better pricing on an ARF, as PRSAs have to pay 0.05% of their value to the Pensions Authority each yearAre there any circumstances in which an ARF might be preferable to a vested PRSA,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?