Post-Redress - Considering fixing and Clause 3.2

danika05

Registered User
Messages
31
We were part of the wider Tracker scandal (tracker was returned to us, compensation etc). Since we have been enjoying, like a lot of people, the low rates being back on a tracker has afforded us. But as rates rise we are assessing our options - stick with the tracker or fix.

In our contract we have clause 3.2, giving us the option to return to a tracker rate after a fixed rate period. The catch is that rate is referred to as ‘the bank’s then prevailing rate (appropriate to the Mortgage Loan)’

Firstly, does anyone know what tracker rate AIB would offer us after a fixed rate if we decided to go that route?

And secondly, seeing as the clause refers to the prevailing rate as ‘appropriate to the mortgage loan’ and the mortgage loan itself was found to be flawed/illegal etc, (however it should be referred to vis-a-vis the tracker scandal.) what impact might that have?

Has anyone have recent experience of similar?

Thanks
 
If it specifically says Tracker Rate in clause 3.2 I would say this is ok however, I would ask them to clarify in writing that this is the case, and what the % over ECB tracker would be. I would say the 'appropriate' reference means things like Loan To Value etc. so that could tie in with the % over ECB tracker available.
 
In our contract we have clause 3.2, giving us the option to return to a tracker rate after a fixed rate period. The catch is that rate is referred to as ‘the bank’s then prevailing rate (appropriate to the Mortgage Loan)’

@danika05 In this post, @Brendan Burgess warns:

It sounds like your contract is of the type that Brendan is warning about, and you would not be able to return to a "good" tracker rate at the end of your fixed-rate period.