I highly doubt this.However in the UK like here there is this speculation that a future government due to rising costs of state pension (even though you have paid your contributions for this) could be means tested.
Read about it yesterday too. They review it every 6 years. 2017, 2023 and this review is to be complete by 2029. You could presume it goes up a year every 6 years at worst.Just read an article about a review of the state pension in UK, they looking at increasing the retirement age again , it's now 67, maybe they increase it to 68. I was hoping that this wouldn't be happening so fast, it probably be 70 by the time I'm there
The government view all recipients of the State pension as the same. That includes people who the State pension is their only source of income and multi millionaires. Unless they find a cheap way of distinguishing between those who rely on the State pension* and those that don't, they have to maintain some sort of indexation. Of course, increasing the pension age is the simplest, quickest and cheapest way of keeping the cost down but that was shot down. It really should be revisited.I would at least expect the value of the state pension to be eroded overtime
Yes, but they don't have to maintain the generous indexation that they currently have.Unless they find a cheap way of distinguishing between those who rely on the State pension and those that don't, they have to maintain some sort of indexation.
What about the distinction between people who have paid their contributions for state pension and those that haven't, that is the main reason they can never bring in means testing. However they could allow the state pension to gradually erode by not raising it and then giving a separate means tested top up to those that are totally dependent on it . However we are not taking about socialist Ireland here but uk , they are just going to increase the age for everyone to get the pension. Unless they find a cheap way of distinguishing between those who rely on the State pension* and those that don't, they have to maintain some sort of indexation.
I was incorrectly talking about our own pension issues and not the UKs. I 100% agree, the triple lock is insane. Like here, pensions is a political hot potato, with many headlines about pensioners having to pay tax on their pensions...because the increases are so big!! You'd think dropping one or two of the three locks would be palatable but with the populist Reform party snapping at Labours heels, it would be a hard sell.Yes, but they don't have to maintain the generous indexation that they currently have.
They're way ahead of you, Joe. In the UK Pension Credit is a benefit payable to anyone over retirement age whose weekly income is less than (currently) £218. The full rate of the basic state pension for a single person is currently £176, so a pensioner whose only income is the basic state pension will qualify for pension credit on top of that.What about the distinction between people who have paid their contributions for state pension and those that haven't, that is the main reason they can never bring in means testing. However they could allow the state pension to gradually erode by not raising it and then giving a separate means tested top up to those that are totally dependent on it .
No nothing received. I called them at the end of (edit:Did you receive an invitation to claim letter? Did it state how much you'd be getting? I imagine if they've not yet allocated your most recent contributions, they'll get round to it at some stage, and it will then include back payments to your 66th birthday.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?