R
Rujib
Guest
Hi,
We have an old rural cotage on which we applied for planning permission to erect a two bed and bathroom plus utility room extension out the back as well as a sunroom to the front.
This application was rejected on the grounds that the front extension was not in keeping with the existing cottage's vernacular style.
The council as an alternative suggested that we carry out repair and reconstruction work to an existing outbuilding which abbuts the eastern gable of the existing cottage and incorporate that into the plan with the proposed extension to the rear of the existing cottage. At the same time we were told to drop the plan for the proposed front extension sun room.
We retained an architecht to draw up plans according to the councils proposal. The new plan was accepted by the council and planning permission was granted.
Our problem now is that the cost of the new design is just way above our budget. We have tried six builders who have all said it is complicated and slow work which will cost.
Right now we are quite disillusioned and want to proceed with a small extension to the rear totalling less than 400 sq feet and forgetting about the front sunroom of the first planning application (which was refused) and the complicated design for the second planning application which was granted.
QUESTION : Having gone through all of that with the council is it safe to go ahed with our proposed small rear extension.
Such a development is normally exempt from planning permission.
I know that our proposal will be 100% to the rear of the existing cottage, cannot be seen from the front of the cottage, cannot impinge on any neighbour as it has no visible neighbours (nearest neighbour is 1 km away and is not visible from our cottage). It will also be constructed to the standards of current building requlations.
Thanks
We have an old rural cotage on which we applied for planning permission to erect a two bed and bathroom plus utility room extension out the back as well as a sunroom to the front.
This application was rejected on the grounds that the front extension was not in keeping with the existing cottage's vernacular style.
The council as an alternative suggested that we carry out repair and reconstruction work to an existing outbuilding which abbuts the eastern gable of the existing cottage and incorporate that into the plan with the proposed extension to the rear of the existing cottage. At the same time we were told to drop the plan for the proposed front extension sun room.
We retained an architecht to draw up plans according to the councils proposal. The new plan was accepted by the council and planning permission was granted.
Our problem now is that the cost of the new design is just way above our budget. We have tried six builders who have all said it is complicated and slow work which will cost.
Right now we are quite disillusioned and want to proceed with a small extension to the rear totalling less than 400 sq feet and forgetting about the front sunroom of the first planning application (which was refused) and the complicated design for the second planning application which was granted.
QUESTION : Having gone through all of that with the council is it safe to go ahed with our proposed small rear extension.
Such a development is normally exempt from planning permission.
I know that our proposal will be 100% to the rear of the existing cottage, cannot be seen from the front of the cottage, cannot impinge on any neighbour as it has no visible neighbours (nearest neighbour is 1 km away and is not visible from our cottage). It will also be constructed to the standards of current building requlations.
Thanks