just tell the truth bring your print out, not many challenge this , ask the Garda what he saw, when in court, it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt, judge has to be sure before he can convict, i think you will be ok
Don't share your optimism here, based on experience, from 1981.
The Garda perjured himself, but my solicitor, who now sits on Supreme Court, just shrugged and said, the system wont work if they don't believe the Guards.
On a more practical note, how can you prove that you didn't have another fone while perhaps engaged in "extraterrestrial" activities.
Perhaps the issue with the incoming data is the privacy rights of the caller are being breached
Not when the witness is a Guard, where you must disprove his testimony.… when in court, it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt, ...
The offence is holding the phone, you do not have to be using it, lot of people don't know that,
Not when the witness is a Guard, where you must disprove his testimony.
The justification for dashcams becomes more plausible the way things are going...although in this case, as well as a cam pointed forwards you'd need another one pointed back towards the driver...How do you disprove his testimony.
Does that mean I can be charged with using a mobile phone while driving even when I'm only using it to change songs on my iPhone which is pugged into my car audio system?
I agree with Zlatan - that confirmation from eMobile of no activity on my phone, should be useful evidence in my case.
Has anyone succeeded in getting info on incoming activity, or confirmation of no incoming activity, from their phone company.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?