I have two quotes from timber frame manufacturers – Cygnum and Kingspan Century. The house is bungalow circa 3000sq ft. I have looked through the quotes and picked out two possible options which I would appreciate any opinions on.
Cygnum:
8” frame – 46250
Erect - 16270
Plasterboard – 3646
Cellulose insulation – 6808 (quilt equivalent for 8” – 5,310) is cellulose better? Cellulose price includes installation/quilt does not. Both have u-value of 0.2
Service cavity – 1403
Silent home upgrade – 1588
Total – 75,965
Century:
Kit – 69813
Erect (optima option) – 18,946
Optima upgrade – 9619 (u value .15)
Total – 98378
Other features of both quotes seem fairly similar with similar non-erect items supplied. Is there anything in the century quote to justify the extra 25k?. Is the cygnum spec a good system? With blocks on the outside and a cavity, would the u-value be dropped further? And could I spend the extra 20k better on other areas?
Also, I was looking on botanicgp website and their construction diagram has no cavity but has an additional 60mm of rockwool outside the timber frame. http://www.botanicgp.com/heartwood/newdesign/EnergySavings.html. Would this be efficient to add to the cygnum system and what kind of cost would be involved in that?. If it was possible what u-value would I get? or does there need to be a cavity between the frame and the block?
Thanks
Cygnum:
8” frame – 46250
Erect - 16270
Plasterboard – 3646
Cellulose insulation – 6808 (quilt equivalent for 8” – 5,310) is cellulose better? Cellulose price includes installation/quilt does not. Both have u-value of 0.2
Service cavity – 1403
Silent home upgrade – 1588
Total – 75,965
Century:
Kit – 69813
Erect (optima option) – 18,946
Optima upgrade – 9619 (u value .15)
Total – 98378
Other features of both quotes seem fairly similar with similar non-erect items supplied. Is there anything in the century quote to justify the extra 25k?. Is the cygnum spec a good system? With blocks on the outside and a cavity, would the u-value be dropped further? And could I spend the extra 20k better on other areas?
Also, I was looking on botanicgp website and their construction diagram has no cavity but has an additional 60mm of rockwool outside the timber frame. http://www.botanicgp.com/heartwood/newdesign/EnergySavings.html. Would this be efficient to add to the cygnum system and what kind of cost would be involved in that?. If it was possible what u-value would I get? or does there need to be a cavity between the frame and the block?
Thanks