... I was pleasantly surprised by his attitude.
He also said that if the public sector saw those at the top of the banking and finance sector, as well as the government, getting their comeuppance there would be far less anger. I had to agree with him.
Fair point. To be honest I was surprised my his hostility to th unions.You shouldn't have been. Pleased, maybe; surprised no. The public sector comprises a large number of people, and you can find a wide range of views among them. Those opposed to the levy are, of course, more vocal. People who say silly or extreme things catch the headlines because they sell papers.
I agree with that.So would I agree, but I am concerned that we might go too far in a hunt for scapegoats. We need to be measured. Some of those who got things wrong were acting in good faith.
I would like to see a greater sense of purpose in identifying what went wrong, and who did wrong. The absence of such a drive leaves a great deal of public anger without a clear focus, and people who are innocent are in danger of being blamed along with the guilty.
What other choice did they have? Since the Govt was firmly embraced in a menage-a-trois with the builders and the bankers, prices (particularly property prices) were spiraling, and the unions had no choice but to chase inflation in order to give their members (particularly younger members) any half-decent hope of a half-decent standard of living.Union leaders seem to have forgotten that they were the ones sitting down with Government as part of the Social Partnership and deciding how to spend the tax income (whether from construction activities or elsewhere). They contributed to a huge increase in public sector numbers, benchmarking etc and now when the economy has reversed the unions are claiming that it was not their fault.
...and that fundamental lack of understanding of how economics works is at the root of what is wrong with the Unions and, by extension, the country.What other choice did they have? Since the Govt was firmly embraced in a menage-a-trois with the builders and the bankers, prices (particularly property prices) were spiraling, and the unions had no choice but to chase inflation in order to give their members (particularly younger members) any half-decent hope of a half-decent standard of living.
What other choice did they have? Since the Govt was firmly embraced in a menage-a-trois with the builders and the bankers, prices (particularly property prices) were spiraling, and the unions had no choice but to chase inflation in order to give their members (particularly younger members) any half-decent hope of a half-decent standard of living.
...the unions had a choice they could have said no stop the madness and stop the cosy relationship with the builders and bankers ...
I think this sums it up. We (as an electorate) deserve everything we get.Politicians who said that didn't get enough votes to stop the madness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?