C
Clara
Guest
I'm confused by the wording on the revenue website regarding tax residency.
The numbers in the "however" example don't add up to me. In that case if year 1 was 365 (-30) and year 2 was 14 (-14) then the amount of time spent in the country is still 335 and therefore over 280 and should be regarded as tax resident.
But the revenue website is obviously correct so what am I missing in my logic?
My circumstances
2009 = 365
2010 = 160
2011 = 365 or 275 (depending on circumstances)
So will I be tax resident for 2010 or not? I'm guessing either way I'll be resident for 2011?
thanks
if you spend 280 days or more in Ireland for any purpose over a period of two consecutive tax years you will be regarded as resident in Ireland for the second tax year. For example, if you spend 140 days here in year 1 and 150 days here in year 2 you will be resident in Ireland for year 2.
(However, you can spend up to 30 days in total in Ireland in either tax year and this test will not apply to make you resident even though the combined total of days spent in Ireland over the two tax years may be 280 or more. For example, if you spend 365 days in Ireland in year 1 and only 14 days here in year 2, thereby giving a combined total presence of 379 days, you will not be regarded as resident for year 2 under this test.)
The numbers in the "however" example don't add up to me. In that case if year 1 was 365 (-30) and year 2 was 14 (-14) then the amount of time spent in the country is still 335 and therefore over 280 and should be regarded as tax resident.
But the revenue website is obviously correct so what am I missing in my logic?
My circumstances
2009 = 365
2010 = 160
2011 = 365 or 275 (depending on circumstances)
So will I be tax resident for 2010 or not? I'm guessing either way I'll be resident for 2011?
thanks